To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@abit·
0.000 HBD
To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution
You know you have a unfair advantage as an author, as you can upvote for yourself instantly when posting a new article. We know that you want eye balls and followers, that's fine.

But that looks greedy. As a popular author, you've already got a lot of people following you. After you voted with a large Steem Power, the reward for people voting after you will be diluted much. For better curation reward distribution, to give your followers' more reward, I sincerely suggest that you don't vote for yourself when posting.

This suggestion applies especially to early adopters for example @dan, @dantheman, @theoretical and @blocktrades, but also applies to new authors who gained meaningful Steem Power via writing, for example @stellabelle, @cryptoctopus, @donkeypong and etc.

Thanks.

//Edit:
For authors with not much Steem Power, I think it's not too bad to vote instantly.
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,