To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution
steem·@abit·
0.000 HBDTo authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution
You know you have a unfair advantage as an author, as you can upvote for yourself instantly when posting a new article. We know that you want eye balls and followers, that's fine. But that looks greedy. As a popular author, you've already got a lot of people following you. After you voted with a large Steem Power, the reward for people voting after you will be diluted much. For better curation reward distribution, to give your followers' more reward, I sincerely suggest that you don't vote for yourself when posting. This suggestion applies especially to early adopters for example @dan, @dantheman, @theoretical and @blocktrades, but also applies to new authors who gained meaningful Steem Power via writing, for example @stellabelle, @cryptoctopus, @donkeypong and etc. Thanks. //Edit: For authors with not much Steem Power, I think it's not too bad to vote instantly.
👍 arcaneinfo, linouxis9, nanzo-scoop, tshering-tamang, gavvet, dedriss, steemychicken1, justtryme90, mostar, abit, coinbitgold, grittenald, gandamx, rseixas, jalantikus, steemtest, stealthtrader, vkoreshkoff, rimantas, stijn, yuda-susanto, business, algo-rythm, qonq99, c3zary, doesntmatter, macchicken, sictransitgloria, nickjames, alittle, afew, mest, karchersmith, jillstein2016, ace108, stats, magicmonk, theflowers, gaitan, murh, puffin, wawacoffee, abusaleh,