RE: How much are media being filtered to prevent awareness of climate change and environmental destruction? by voxxov

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @voxxov/how-much-are-media-being-filtered-to-prevent-awareness-of-climate-change-and-environmental-destruction

·@alexazapiec·
0.000 HBD
Well... media and global politics have a big interest in the environmental crisis, and much of this crisis comes as a result of the economic and trade principles. Vicious circle... Pity but nothing new. Thus, for me, a bigger problem lies just in us, random citizens. The general public is too passive and ignorant. Everyone talks, comments and complaints. But not many are taking action. Referring to your case of palm oil, think how much it would help if people simply stop buying products that contain palm oil, not only cosmetics but food as well (esp. it's not even healthy). So, 'No customers - No products', easy right? Not really... And here the main issue starts 1). many people are buying stuff despite their awareness of let's call it 'evil' (shrinking rainforest, endangered species, water pollution, child labour, violence, women exploitation etc.) - And why? Mostly because of ignorance and passive approach. 2). People often claim they are not aware of some problems caused by companies they trust and support. - And that's a pure ignorance. Both cases are disgusting and ridiculous. How could we not realize that mass production and overconsumption happening constantly by and for billions of people is not affecting anything? It's too much to be called 'stupidity'. I see it as a lack of social responsibility and taking 'the easy way'. Better to say 'I didn't know' or 'I'm nobody to change the reality so I don't even give a try' - than to act, care, contribute... Sad but true. 21 century...
👍 , ,