"Hardfork Successful" -> "Hardfork Complete"...Yep

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@berniesanders·
0.000 HBD
"Hardfork Successful" -> "Hardfork Complete"...Yep
![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmaj8GAmvZfutahN5QdmV9XNxknxUaVY9B8C4MF9TVfVrN/image.png)

Did you notice the title of the @steemitblog post was changed this morning?  

I'm glad @ned realized HF20 was **not** a success (even by his loose standards), but, shouldn't he have known that before they made the post?  Shouldn't the code have been **tested** before being released to production? The issue was immediately obvious upon release.  That's sad.

Yes, HF20 was an absolute **FAIL** by today's software development standards and will likely bring more bad press for Steem.

**As I've said before, relying on these amateurs hired by Steemit to keep this blockchain alive, will be the death of Steem.**

It's time for our top 20 witness (who btw, are controlled by a single voting account) to step up and actually **do something** with the funds they are bringing in.  Or, y'all can keep barely feeding the money tree, complying with all of @ned's wishes, and just wait for it to whither away.

**The choice is yours, I know what I'd do.**
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,