![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXM4Jx4qcQD7GZnwX28ddwsNSuRHBeGX2bkpnLGjpzqwH/image.png)

When Twitter first implemented its "hide replies" function last year <a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/09/23/twitters-hide-replies-function-serves-to-appease-the-elitists-of-the-politicalmedia-class/">I published an article</a> warning that it could be used by establishment narrative managers to marginalize dissident voices and diminish the relatively egalitarian nature of the platform. When I wrote it I was imagining the function being used by overt manipulators like cable TV pundits and <em>Washington Post</em> columnists, and think tank operatives like Neera Tanden who <a href="https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/1175022156541059072?s=20">vocally supported</a> the implementation of the function.

What I absolutely was <em>not</em> expecting, as paranoid and conspiracy-minded as I am, was a highly regarded UN-associated international chemical watchdog group using the function for that purpose.

As of this writing, if you go to <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW">the Twitter account</a> for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), you'll see <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1227594827035967493">this tweet</a> at the second from the top:

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmcPKA1EX2EDmMUV1YP8oQMCzAF4uVXamEgfmHyobyouUi/image.png)
https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1227594827035967493

If you log on to Twitter and go to that tweet and click this little button, it will take you to a <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1227594827035967493/hidden">section of "hidden replies"</a> which aren't visible on the main tweet.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7818" src="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/medium-2-1.jpg" alt="" width="661" height="623" />

You will not be surprised to learn that <a href="https://twitter.com/CarlJohanMagnus/status/1228381658258296833?s=20">the tweet</a> which the OPCW's Twitter account has chosen to hide is critical of the organization:

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7819" src="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Screen-Shot-2020-02-19-at-12.23.03-PM.png" alt="" width="660" height="182" />

That "#wikileaksdoumareport" hashtag in the hidden tweet refers to <a href="https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/">the leaks</a> which have been <a href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/medias-deafening-silence-on-latest-wikileaks-drops-is-its-own-scandal-ad0d28fe0c5c">pouring out from the OPCW</a> adding to <a href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/the-12-strongest-arguments-that-douma-was-a-false-flag-77d300b495c2">the mountain of evidence</a> that the US, UK and France bombed the Syrian government in 2018 as a retaliation for a chemical weapons attack in the town Douma which did not occur. Whoever is in charge of the OPCW's Twitter account does not like the lowly commoners talking about this on their page.

Here's <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1227535842778001408">an OPCW tweet</a> from a week ago which has the same issue:

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmXvrk5u7B393Rb5jgy37EjzT8pJ18bkteaFEYvYQPpJSL/image.png)
https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1227535842778001408

Click the same little button to <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1227535842778001408/hidden">view hidden replies</a> and you'll see <strong><em>three</em></strong> of them on this one, again all discussing the scandal-ridden Douma investigation:

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7820" src="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Screen-Shot-2020-02-19-at-12.41.42-PM.png" alt="" width="660" height="538" />

It <a href="https://twitter.com/amin251/status/1229919459915313152">doesn't seem to happen</a> if you're not logged on to your account, and seems to <a href="https://twitter.com/collapse_into/status/1229697734963269632">express differently on different browsers</a>, but if you log in and scroll through the OPCW Twitter page you'll find many tweets with hidden replies, almost all of which directly pertain to the Douma scandal.

The OPCW tweet which appears to have the largest number of replies is the <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1225465454065524738">smear job they released earlier this month</a> attacking the whistleblowers whose leaks poked giant holes in the official Douma narrative. This smear job has been ripped to shreds in <a href="https://thegrayzone.com/2020/02/11/new-leaks-shatter-opcws-attacks-douma-whistleblowers/">an article by <em>Grayzone</em>'s Aaron Maté</a>, who in his trademark style systematically debunks the organisation's attempts to spin the whistleblowers as incompetent outsiders who tried to manipulate the Douma investigation for no clear reason.

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmf4mewKYjjDLXpDwZVX7VJ1d3F3vMU8QKy5JMYbNcjBFd/image.png)
https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1225465454065524738

If you <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1225465454065524738">go to that OPCW tweet</a> and scroll down you'll see dozens of spaces where replies ought to be, with the message "This reply was hidden by the original Tweet author," meaning hidden by the author of the initial top tweet by the OPCW. I've <a href="https://imgur.com/a/drkxFvx">archived screenshots of the entire thread here</a> as it looks from my account as of this writing, but here's a small sample of what the top of the replies section looks like on that tweet:

<img src="https://i.imgur.com/VsxlCXT.png" />

<img src="https://i.imgur.com/UfAG6cs.png" />

I myself <a href="https://twitter.com/caitoz/status/1225474719173885952">posted the reply</a> that got the most likes and retweets back when the OPCW first shared its smear job, but in a strange twist on Twitter's "hide replies" function it doesn't show up in the main thread <em><strong>or</strong></em> in <a href="https://twitter.com/OPCW/status/1225465454065524738/hidden">its "hidden replies" section</a>. <a href="https://twitter.com/NeotipPro/status/1229922403997773825">Other users</a> also say <a href="https://twitter.com/Tim_Hayward_/status/1229913359950270464">they can't see it</a> in either section. So as things are right now it looks like some posts in threads with a large number of hidden replies are just disappeared entirely, which is all the more incentive for narrative managers to use it.

There are already many users in the comments objecting to the OPCW yet again making use of opacity to silence dissident voices, and understandably so. Ever since <a href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/confirmed-chemical-weapons-assessment-contradicting-official-syria-narrative-is-authentic-fbcbf7ef281a">the first Douma leak in May 2018</a> this organisation has been <a href="https://twitter.com/SMaurizi/status/1187992589594775552?s=20">stonewalling</a> <a href="http://archive.is/eFnVf#selection-259.254-259.318">journalists</a>, refusing to answer crucial questions, smearing its own investigators and denying them a platform to speak, all after hiding from the public the fact that there had been large amounts of internal dissent regarding its Douma investigation. This dissent included <a href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/medias-deafening-silence-on-latest-wikileaks-drops-is-its-own-scandal-ad0d28fe0c5c">unanimous agreement between four toxicologists</a> that no chlorine attack occurred in Douma, and reports that <a href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/deluge-of-new-leaks-further-shreds-the-establishment-syria-narrative-e5ba3ba9b44b">some 20 OPCW inspectors</a> had voiced objections to the way the Douma investigation was taking place.

The OPCW had no business hiding all this information from the public about an event which led to an act of war against a sovereign nation, and it has no business hiding the public's attempts to demand more information be brought into the light.

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdjSkpoxjNsGXrq9nDWfj3KciiyeBSvm2MSqK8hgP6TDB/image.png)
https://twitter.com/Tim_Hayward_/status/1229814918393815040

These deliberate acts of obfuscation make no sense if you look at the OPCW as an independent international investigative body whose sole interest is truth and the elimination of chemical weapons, but they make perfect sense if you see it as a narrative management apparatus of the US-centralized empire. The US government <a href="https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/10/29/the-usas-history-of-controlling-the-opcw-to-promote-regime-change/">already has an established history</a> of manipulating the OPCW into facilitating the advancement of pre-existing regime change agendas in the Middle East, and not <a href="http://archive.is/YHAzd#selection-403.136-407.258">one</a> but <a href="https://thegrayzone.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Henderson-Testimony-UN.pdf">two whistleblowers</a> have separately attested that US government officials were brought in by OPCW leadership (in violation of the organisation's supposed independence) to persuade them that the Syrian government had committed a chemical weapons attack.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is acting like a narrative management operation because that is what it has become: a tool to help the US-centralized empire spin narratives favorable to pre-existing regime change agendas like the one <a href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/the-us-empire-has-been-trying-to-regime-change-syria-since-long-before-2011-40d4e6648d54">it has long had for the Syrian government</a>. That's how it behaves, so we should ignore all narrative spin and assume that that's what it is until its behavior changes. As long as it continues walking like a duck and quacking like a duck, we should continue to assume that it's a duck.

The OPCW has been hiding replies on Twitter, yes. But at least it has stopped hiding what it is.

_______________________________

<em>Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="http://caitlinjohnstone.com/" rel="noopener"><em>website</em></a><em>, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/just-a-note-of-gratitude-to-readers-and-patrons-7df920b5ced" rel="noopener"><em>entirely reader-supported</em></a><em>, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://www.facebook.com/CaitlinAJohnstone/" rel="noopener"><em>Facebook</em></a><em>, following my antics on</em> <a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://twitter.com/caitoz" rel="noopener"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>, checking out my podcast on either </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU8Yu4WZJ11Il3TZmNiMUFQ" rel="noopener"><em>Youtube</em></a><em>, </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://soundcloud.com/going_rogue" rel="noopener"><em>soundcloud</em></a><em>, </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/going-rogue-with-caitlin-johnstone/id1333112416" rel="noopener"><em>Apple podcasts</em></a><em> or </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://open.spotify.com/show/5336DPNn19xNci8UNOkAT4" rel="noopener"><em>Spotify</em></a><em>, following me on </em><a href="https://steemit.com/@caitlinjohnstone"><em>Steemit</em></a><em>, throwing some money into my hat on </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://www.patreon.com/user?u=4445783" rel="noopener"><em>Patreon</em></a><em> or</em> <a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://paypal.me/caitlinjohnstone" rel="noopener"><em>Paypal</em></a>, <em>purchasing some of my </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://www.redbubble.com/people/caitoz?ref=artist_title_name" rel="noopener"><em>sweet merchandise</em></a><em>, buying my new book </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://gumroad.com/l/roguenation" rel="noopener"><em>Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone</em></a><em>, or my previous book </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://www.amazon.com/Woke-Field-Guide-Utopia-Preppers/dp/064823455X/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8" rel="noopener"><em>Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers</em></a><em>. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/11-things-you-should-know-about-me-and-where-im-coming-from-a6b9ddf9806e" rel="noopener"><em>click here</em></a><em>. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, </em><a title="This link will take you away from steemit.com" href="https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/i-permanently-release-all-copyrights-to-all-my-writing-use-any-of-it-however-you-want-9ad929b92d42" rel="noopener"><em>has my permission</em></a><em> to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.</em>

<img src="https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/720/0*xhvkiGbE9L9FrbrZ" />

<em>Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2</em>