RE: You cannot take away from the author that which does not belong to the author. by acidyo

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @acidyo/re-nonameslefttouse-qwi1nk

·@calumam·
0.000 HBD
Yourself and @nonameslefttouse have been around a whole bunch of shady characters so I am not surprised that you've both assumed some kind of agenda is going on. 

Like @trostparadox has said, the current system is not optimal, some solutions are being considered and experimented with, genuine efforts are happening. No one can get it right 100% of the time but throwing around this agenda nonsense is a bad look from you both.


@acidyo these two comments you made (snippets from [here](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@acidyo/re-trostparadox-qwhaj9) and [here](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@trostparadox/re-acidyo-qwhyqy#@acidyo/re-nonameslefttouse-qwi4nj) for full context) are alarming to me.

>the PoB people seem to instead want to use some centralized ways of muting accounts (from their earnings even which is so baffling to me it makes me not want to look into what else they're doing at all, nor have I once posted in there because of that).

>Naturally the same could be said about my intentions defending Hive out of fear that PoB might take more and more value from Hive 

Does the defending expand further than the back and forth here or is it something else entirely? Concerning for me (and I'd suspect others too) when you haven't looked further into Proof Of Brain to see what is being built. 

Are these agendas that you speak of fuelling this fear that Proof Of Brain is taking value from HIVE?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwicgz)</sub></center>
👍 ,