[–]chickyrogue 2 points 1 year ago 
[–]KnightBeforeTomorrow 2 points 3 days ago* Iraq's central bank was made compliant with the world wide cartel as one of the most urgent priorities within months of our invasion We changed the Iraq bank right away, and beneath the radar of the American public. The Banking Law was issued September 19, 2003. The law brings Iraq’s legal framework for banking in line with international standards, and seeks to promote confidence in the banking system by establishing a safe, sound, competitive and accessible banking system. http://www.cbi.iq/index.php?pid=History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Iraq Then we changed Afghanistan's central bank https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Kabul_Bank Then we changed Libya's central bank. Sorta looks like a pattern forming at this point, no? http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/are-the-middle-east-wars-really-about-forcing-the-world-into-dollars-and-private-central-banking.html Syria's central bank is owned by Syria's own government and not the worldwide cartel. That is why the U.S. is destroying their sovereignty. The Syrian central bank has already been deprived of its homepage, which weakens their ability to do business while the entire country is having mountains of debt created, making them vulnerable to the world banking cartel. www.banquecentrale.gov.sy Syria's central banks homepage can only be found now on the WayBack Machine. http://web.archive.org/web/20150206001208/http://banquecentrale.gov.sy/main-eg.htm They're being groomed to become debt slaves like nearly all of the other countries. Many of the BIS member countries are ganging up against Syria while the U.S. creates massive debt for them. My example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Syria Recent developments The US, Canada, EU, Arab League and Turkey all imposed Sanctions on the central bank because of Syrian civil war.[6][7][8] In the case of the US sanctions had already been in place against the Central Bank of Syria as a result of Section 311 of the Patriot Act, which accused the Bank of money laundering.[9] They may use the civil war in Syria, that we orchestrated after the U/S. population demanded that we not go to war against Syria, as a fig leaf but it's all to bring Syria's government owned independent central bank into 'compliance' with world standards' which is a way of forcing them to join the fiat money creation monopoly. The way this will be accomplished is that we are creating destruction on a grand scale that will eventually force Syria to borrow from the BIS, the World Bank or the IMF, making them debt slaves just like you and me. Syria's central bank is being given little hints that we mean business further down the page linked above . During the Syrian civil war the Central Bank building has been attacked three times. In April 2012 a Rocket-propelled grenade was shot at the building, in April 2013 it was affected by a car bombing nearby and in October 2013 it was hit by mortar shells.[12] Thou shalt not operate an independent central bank. Then next of course, we will change the central bank of Iran before the smaller countries without a worldwide monopoly member bank will give in. If nothing serious has changed such as the status of the BRICS nations, That will be the end of the "war on terror" It was and is, all about a BIS central banking monopoly on the creation of money.



[–]chickyrogue 2 points 1 year ago 
Once assumed that they brought the towers down intentionally and they did come not down accidentally, I think there are two possible reasons, and there may be several others.. psychological effect. destroy evidence. As for the evidence being destroyed there may be two aspects: make sure that it’s hard to find body parts, plane parts that might provide clues. there is one theory i find quite interesting. A guy named E. P. Heidner released one document in 2008 in which he (as he states in the introduction) develops a context in which 9/11 might be analysed: he says that 9/11 could be considered a crime primarily and not a terror attack. He links Cantor Fitzgerald, Euro Brokers and the ONI at the pentagon (and several others in the WTC complex) to investigations in a big case of money/gold laundering. Actually he’s talking about several hundreds of billions of dollars, that have been transferred to 10-years bonds in 1991 in the context of the destruction of the Soviet Union. These giant amounts of money laid kinda dormant for 10 years and were due for clearing on September, 12th. I don’t know much about this money stuff, so maybe there are errors in my very short version of this document. Just check it out. It’s called: Collateral Damage, E. P. Heidner I don’t claim that this is what actually happened. But his theory is quite comprehensive and it’s not very technical. He defines a framework for looking at 9/11 from another point of view, but does not provide many details like as to how the tower might have come down. There are so many theories out there and so many strange people providing them. Most of them seem to be nothing more than gatekeepers. Of all the theories about 9/11 in my opinion this is (even if it’s not [entirely] true) the most fascinating one. There are several events he tries to link together. The most exciting piece is the story of a hawaiian trial Rogelio Roxas vs. Marcos Family. The official file is downloadable and the amount of money Roxas’ trust received as compensation is out of this world. I think a lot about 9/11. And I am sure that looking at litttle details is important but one should frequently step back and tale a look at the big picture.


[–]chickyrogue  2 points 1 year ago 
omg....THIS! [–]CaptainObviousMC 5 points 7 days ago I can't name names for privacy reasons. The gist of what I do is teach computers to do sentiment analysis on social media posts that are of interest to clients, tag them based on their various properties (author, sentiments, keywords, etc), and add them to a giant graph of all social media posts we're interested in, who else has retweeted them or the link, who responded to them, etc. We use this to estimate exposure numbers and influence, and try to isolate the key people in a social graph which are causing an opinion to form. (Ideally, on the order of minutes or hours instead of days or weeks.) Once we isolate key people, we look for people we know are in their upstream -- people that they read posts from, but who themselves are less influential. (This uses the same social media graph built before.) We then either start flame wars with bots to derail the conversations that are influencing influential people (think nonsense reddit posts about conspiracies that sound like Markov chains of nonsense other people have said), or else send off specific tasks for sockpuppets (changing this wording of an idea here; cause an ideological split there; etc). The goal is to keep opinions we don't want fragmented and from coalescing in to a single voice for long enough that the memes we do want can, at which points they've gotten a head start on going viral and tend to capture a larger-than-otherwise share of media attention. (All of the stuff above is basically the "standard" for online PR (usually farmed out to an LLC with a generic name working for the marketing firm contracted by the big firm; deniability is a word frequently said), once you're above a certain size.) Careful analysis of online communities (or reading the papers where they got caught) would tell you that various nations are using similar technologies against their citizens and other nations. It's not entirely about business that China is concerned with building a domestic social network, and DARPA runs extensive research programs on social graph analysis and influence, on behalf of the Pentagon.

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/527gzp/the_man_whose_office_paid_the_hijackers_was_in/