[Bitshares Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10 to 25

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@cm-steem·
0.000 HBD
[Bitshares Committee Request] Increase the maximum_asset_feed_publishers value from 10 to 25
<center>![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmV6xKfY5wto5yzXVt7sWzJomLvchipCA3N8JG3ZnK2SmJ/image.png)</center>

### Requesting that the BTS Committee increase the max asset feed publishers limit

I've been [working on getting the HERTZ Algorithm Based Asset live on the Bitshares network](https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-42-activated-4-more-bitshares-witnesses-to-go-more-hertz-related-updates) recently, and [ran into problems providing more than 10 private price feed publisher entities](https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1025) within the Bitshares UI.

I chose to use private price feed publishers rather rather than witness & committee options as there are non-active witnesses whom I trust with providing price feeds for the Hertz ABA.

I'm seeking an increase to the 'maximum_asset_feed_publishers' value from 10 to 25. The Bitshares Committee is in charge of these global variables & thus we can increase the limit to accommodate the Hertz ABA's higher private price feed publisher count.

As far as I'm aware, there's no risk associated with increasing this value.

### Relevant links:

* [Mirrored Bitsharestalk thread](https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,25803.msg314984.html)
* [Hertz website](https://sites.google.com/view/hertz-aba/)

Thanks for your time,
CM.
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,