![Screenshot_252.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmUE7D2p7xcH5XmXsPnQVaJTZYceQ4VCLFfGpLb7UXLWXp/Screenshot_252.png)
Among other criticisms that the Ethereum originator believes are valid, which are listed as follows:
1. Scalability is Sucks ; Interception design basically depends on the obstacles, where individual nodes should act on every transaction across the network

2. POV is extremely expensive, and apart from this, 51% of the span camps are unsafe for attacks, there is no effective strategy to overcome one. Selfish mining begins with 25-33% hashpower and 51% of censorship attacks are definitely beneficial.

3. Privacy sucks

4. It is difficult to run large amounts of funds without the loss of personal users due to theft or theft or their personal keys

5. Economics does not encourage good "cleanliness hygiene"; Insufficient incentives for storage clearing and insufficient costs to fill it, especially for long

6. Bunch of various marginal technical inefficiencies.

7. It is difficult for regular users to know that they are negotiating with the contract, and there are no casual or malicious bugs in them.

.........

Probably came about the statement, which demonstrates the intellectual integrity, which came about the result of the position of Radhey's Ethram business community. The authors of this post decided to admire the handwriting of the recent post of Alternate Bitcoin Suurredit, R / BTC. Roger Ver said, referring to Bitcoin core developer and sometimes Firebrand Gregory Maxwell, "Talking perfection is useless at a blockchain (see link above) in any case. So there is no worry, the long-standing value of Ethram still ~ 0 is :) "

The manner in which the conversation goes normally, and it is shown that the meetings of the atheram developer are now open and logged in, hence any person with a beef of "centralization" in relation to the atom development process It can see how it actually works in practice. When the original poster of Atiram's merchant praised Butterin, he gave an unexpected statement at the beginning of the article - criticizing his own invention which he agrees with and wants to work towards improvement. The discussion is interesting for anyone interested in Ethore, since Butterin has shared more thoughts on the future of Atirum after the recent block chains, which prevented many of our readers from participating in the offerings of various early coins on the Iterem stage.

For example, when asked about his opinion on the approach of Rootstock scaling, Butterin admitted that it was "very interesting", but he said that the only possible result with the basis of Itoram's design is possible:

Fortunately, the atorium contract can already be done, although the incentives to work in this way are not yet adequately adequate; This is a special case of 5. It must be resolved with a major increase in SSTOAR / account creation value or storage rent.