Welcome Hardfork 20, its been interesting reading the disappointment and excitement around the hardfork. One of the obvious drawbacks of Hardfork 20 from the data I have been analyzing are "_decrease user interaction_" and lack of voting.  If you like me, you have to save your "Credits" because you got accustom to sharing your thoughts in a blog and the fear of not having enough "Credits" to perform that said function is not something I like to deal with. On the flip side of things, I realized we have a "commodity" that's in demand, and I certainly like to put a price on it and sell it on the internal exchange. 

If we all agree that Resource Credits is the way forward, I would like to suggest witnesses and Steemit team consider opening a market that is trade-able against Steem or SBD. I notice the Steem accounts "Resource Credit" is sitting by and folks who seriously want to continue transacting may consider buying Resource Credits from others who are not active. It can become a lucrative side market, think about it, I be encourage to power up, I be able to earn from delegation and my Resource Credit holding. 

Lets be honest, I realize Hardfork 20 is all about increasing Steem value, it did not go as plan or probably it did but the reaction from it wasn't expected. Its all free-market, lets embrace it, for once, the spammy comments have gone so that something good. My proposal is quite simple, Resource Credits is in demand, lets make it trade-able on the internal market. On the side note, I realize interacting on the internal exchange also drains, probably we should implement some exception there if we to have better price discovery for native Steem/SBD and future Resource Credit/Steem or Resource Credits/ SBD.

Am I a greedy and selfish capitalist or is this a recommendation that should be taken seriously??????