*In early 2016, fans of a certain “monster movie” were treated to an unexpected, but very welcome, surprise release. A long-awaited teaser trailer to the runaway success that was **Cloverfield**. However, this came with a bizarre twist. The trailer appeared to be about some kind of hostage situation involving a young girl and the burly **John Goodman** as her aggressive, overbearing captor. Though at the same time, the movie bore the same unique trademark brand name everybody knew and loved within its main title. This really got people scratching their heads as to what was going on thus creating a frenzied hype buzz all over again. The reaction similar to the great viral marketing campaign run for **Cloverfield** back in 2008. But, given this mysterious new premise containing vague elements familiar in the original, what of the actual movie itself?*

<center>![1.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmVJ1G5pSyqWZFmNuu2KUBTG2ivA2DWxnq1uQUopY7BZVM/1.jpg)</center><hr>

<p><div class="pull-left">
https://steemitimages.com/DQmUPETfeNgZWrLCAm5tTXLk26r95uDbjDCuKcvA8DW77u1/2.jpg
</div>

Fresh from a break-up with her boyfriend, **Michelle** *(played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead)* drives back home through the state of Louisiana when a freak accident causes her car spin out of control and crash, rendering her unconscious. Upon waking up, she soon finds out somebody has abducted her by the name of **Howard** *(played by the great John Goodman)* and intends to imprison her in her own secluded private cell. Now, to reveal anything else at this point would be tantamount to ruining any further upcoming surprises or shocks this movie has in store. So the vague premise that I’ve just outlined is more than enough to enjoy the hell out of this movie. Hang on a second, did I just say “enjoy”? Damn straight I did. The producers of this “spin-off” to the **Cloverfield** universe, did a stellar job once more.

<p><div class="pull-right">
https://steemitimages.com/DQmPTGFwTzfUVrPmFKcV8XDNdsmCfeoF4Lvg3h79V7GHc3e/3.jpg
</div>

First things first. Gone is the documentary-style found footage angle. In its place, a traditional movie as we’re all used to seeing. But a tense, grim, thriller is the best summation to making up the rest of what remains. **John Goodman** is in his element here as a psychotic, though sometimes conflicted individual, who believes wholeheartedly in a story seemingly concocted in his delusional state. However, is it the actual truth or just an elaborate fabrication or rouse? Well, questions like this are what keep the strings tightened throughout, so to speak. Also, the dangers presented to our main protagonist, **Michelle**, appear very real and keep you on the edge of your seat the entire time. A knockout job delivered by **Winstead** allows the viewer to cringe for her safety as much as wish to see her desperate flight to freedom. Though one thing is clear and obvious as the movie progresses. “Something” has happened but as to what it is, nobody knows. Again, like the last movie, clues are slowly let go the bag and the final picture becomes all the more apparent until the climactic final third act of the movie. And what an act it is!

<p><div class="pull-left">
https://steemitimages.com/DQmY7nUZXSAnsSiq9YBT5x5KYdL19u85aJq2FLxUZR3Qxxy/4.jpg
</div>

Being a part of the **Cloverfield** mythos, this movie does contain certain characteristics that pertain to events, let’s say, “out-of-the-ordinary”. But it was something disclosed in a manner I’m sure no one expected. These series of movies intend to delight at your bewilderment, only to later jar the senses with sequences of manic, abrupt set pieces. It’s all done with care, thought and a keen attention to detail. Carefully laid out in such a way as to draw you in, just to pull the rug from under your feet at the last minute. And I happened to love every minute of it. In terms of criticisms to be had, you’d have to run over the movie with a fine-tooted comb to find any. Some may not like the way the movie wraps up due to it’s dicey conclusion. But that’s me making arbitrary presumptions for an uninformed audience. In fact, I regard that as an actual “plus” point to the film working as well as it does.

*I loved this movie. Rumour has it that a third is on the way sometimes in the near future that will somehow tie all three movies together. But given the secretive and "fake-out" nature of the team behind these gems, what we ultimately end up with is anybody’s guess. A focused, energetic journey into a terrifying situation that happens to be startlingly well made. Another exceptional production that, for me, didn’t break the mould like the previous movie, but can stand proud as an understated masterpiece in it’s own right.*            

<h2><center>My Verdict: *(8.5/10)*</center></h2>  

<center>![PAGE-DIVIDER.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmSZ3NtRqFfQcDtxxQDM2jWnRNmcWECzd7AfAhMYgGiZTB/PAGE-DIVIDER.jpg)</center>

**Source: ([1](http://www.filmandtvnow.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/10cl.jpg),[2](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/PIQUPXutw9DSNU4H8YoxSzgpjJs=/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6206779/10Cloverfield4.0.jpg),[3](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2016/08/15/16/best-films-2016-10-cloverfield-lane.jpg),[4](http://www.dearcastandcrew.com/assets/img/posts/main/10-cloverfield-lane.jpg))*

<h2>Hope you enjoyed this post, please look out for more on the way... (author: @ezzy)</h2><hr>