<h1>Rambling too long original title</h1>
Eye on Your? World, Weeks Round Star Date Nov 18, 2018: The Great Bureaucracy, Assange's Plight, Immutability & Breaking Their System, With Some Friedman thoughts on Freedom sprinkled through & Evicting the Homeless via Zoning?--Happy Thanksgiving, and Thoughts on Lithium drugging Vox Article
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQmFYQtj7hE
<h1>The Great Bureaucracy, One Master for Another, Jimmy Dore Discusses Ranked Choice Sorting</h1>
<blockquote> "A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years."</blockquote>
<h2>--Lysander Spooner</h2>
https://youtu.be/QitvA-zvKHs?t=370
Check out Stan Freberg's great song about the Great Bureaucracy round 6 min 10 sec. In the jurisdiction in which my corpus is currently present they had an election to help make people think it's fair and they in control and invested in it all. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vjRSNQh0cE
I could not bring myself to engage in some level of consent by participating, perhaps my non participation signals I would rather not have any of it all or something else. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSrf9j2pvmU&
Law Professor David Friedman has some interesting ideas on poly centric laws and evolving toward a society premised upon the consent of the governed. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Gppi-O3a8
David's pops had some great ideas on the magic of the price system which is an inherently neutral to positively sum game when exchanges are premised upon volutnary exchange and enlightened self interest in which each party is indifferent if not preferential toward what they receive for what they give. 
Milton Friedman pierced the nonsense pseudo intellectualist scientistic myths that inhabited the world he lived in. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A
Round 3 min 13 sec professor Chomsky discussed the Tayloristic scientific manangment nature of modernity in which Adam Smith criticized division of labor leading to people becoming as dumb and animal like as a human can be. 
https://youtu.be/oB9rp_SAp2U?t=193


Milton Friedman like his son emphasized providing proper incentives to actors that result in the best consequentialist results. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEVI3bmN8TI


Ultimately I have some level of minarchist leanings due to possible free rider problems and or other possible justifications like the Thomas Theorem and how Saul Alinsky asserts one takes reality as a series of alternates. Zuckerberg and Soros may have bankrolled a semi drug decriminalization that failed to be written into a Constitution. Though I think the proposal may have been better, I think it could have done much more to end the failed policies and might have passed if the money pissed away had been a step toward the right system rather than a step sideways in maybe a forward orientation toward another system had been placed before the mass mob for selection. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ9Si5pkAqg

<h1>Jimmy Dore Discussing Ranked Choice Voting and Proportional Representation</h1>
Jimmy Dore n crew discussed ranked choice voting which may be better for third parties, but also got me wonderin bout Arrows theorem. Ranked choice voting is another bureaucratic way to constitute the coercive apparatus of the state where we no longer permit voluntary association and the best opinions of mankind to win out instead demanding at the barrel of a gun that those who might otherwise not finance collective action interventions be forced to or suffer specific and general deterrence premised uponed telologic consequentialist utilitarian intentions but possibly winding up as a tragedy of the kommons kleptocratic wet dream. Proportional voting is another way to possibly better ensure that some other opinions of mankind get representation with they taxation, all but cultures that want to live in a free society based upon individual autonomy and individual self determination and efficacy. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VhjwHnTJVg





<h1>Eyes of Some on Plight of Assange</h1>
As cited below by the failing New York Times, a secret indictment against journalist Assange for publishing what the rulers would prefer you not have the choice to put in you head. Total bullshit what going on. Also depressingly it seems Julian's mom is taking a step away from the campaign to Free Assange. 
<blockquote>
"Dear followers & supporters of my son Julian.

Regretfully I am no longer involved in the campaign to free my son or available for comment. Dont worry, I'm ok.

Many thanks to everyone for your all your work, kind wishes & support. "
</blockquote>
https://twitter.com/AssangeMrs/status/1063563689125527552
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nxigIRUkcU

<h1>Radical Transformation of Permanent Decentralized Immutable Publishing: Making Steem Great Again?</h1>
When me ponderin steem, one thing I like is immutability and making it so one can publish and not worry about censorship. But what if steem tanks, then only to the extent someone keeps and shares the chain can people access what is contained within. If steem or some currency perpetuates to infinity, then it might provide a great mass "public" (but not coercively financed--ultraminarchist Robert Nozick style) good. All the information Assange and actual 4th estate provides us is only useful to the extent we can access it. Steem/some hypothetical currency that guarantees its continued existence even if no longer profitable would be dope and could break their rigged game? 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCIaz0cUP1U
 <h1>Happy ThanksGiving Lest You Homeless and Not in Compliance with Zoning Property Nationalization--where they just compensation yo?</h1>
What do you think? Does Ohio's taking of the liberty to use one's property as a tent city really benefit the public? Is artificially increasing the cost of urban existence for the lowest lot, while providing a subsidy to parcel neighbors who want a lower density for a greater common good? If people don't want a tent city near their property why can't they just purchase the surrounding property or engage in voluntary contracts with neighbors? Why are people so afraid of letting civil debate and the best arguments win out, instead using state institutions that derive their power from the barrel of a gun?
https://fox8.com/2018/10/16/akron-businessman-sues-city-to-keep-homeless-tent-city-on-his-property/?fbclid=IwAR3oVY_gt-xFT1BxavrlpItMq2Fp5aWR8c0imnbCWT8Ar4Ar64l8MxrnF4U

<h1>Last, n maybe least maybe not: Fake Consent, Vox's Fake News to Create Brave New World Style Society of Soma</h1>
Fake News Vox added noise to your world instead of talking about the perpetual wars or easily endable poverty or the failed war on drugs or the plight of Assange, or how they got nearly 1% of Murcan sheeple behind bars, many for victimless conduct or making a less insane world where people dont want to die.

<h2>RD Laing on Mass Madness</h2>
<blockquote>"Society highly values its normal man. It educates children to lose themselves and to become absurd, and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."</blockquote>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=calWRn65x5A
<h2>Bill Kunstler, who defended Central Park 5 Members, who were later exhonerated on mass madness enabled by government</h2>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UL7Ct_urpUY
Government killed Jesus. Government killed socrates. Government did the Holocaust. Government did the Trail of Tears. Government seems to unleash a kind of mass madness. It doesn't appear it was the anarchists behind the greatest crimes of all time. 
The article was titled:
<blockquote>
"How our drinking water could help prevent suicide
Some researchers think putting lithium in our water could save lives."
</blockquote>

What do you think? Should we start drugging people without their consent?

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/24/18010592/future-perfect-podcast-lithium-drinking-water-suicide?fbclid=IwAR2do9kORvkmXfNWrX-SV7x2h8uwn_lKERUpIWm7TU36zzuXBioU-dU6cjE

 I imagine people who want to drug people without their consent might ironically claim people are free to not be drugged and not live on their own property without being drugged, then call that consent. If there were real consent people would just take lithium without having to have it added to the water supply. 

Totally sounding like Soma and "Brave New World".

@CorbettReport, So Corbett Reports this dude may be autistic if that means anything?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64Ros4hmzYw&t=808s
<h1>Further Readin If Ya Do</h1>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_theorem

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/us/politics/julian-assange-indictment-wikileaks.html