JWildfire: experiments with plugins in the base fractal "Enchanted Forest" 2 part
art·@fractal-team·
0.000 HBDJWildfire: experiments with plugins in the base fractal "Enchanted Forest" 2 part
 Hello! Today I will continue my experiments with plugins in the base fractal "Enchanted Forest". Previous lesson see [this link](https://busy.org/@fractal-team/jwildfire-experiments-with-plugins-in-the-base-fractal-enchanted-forest-1-part). We have already examined the plug-ins in the first triangle, we proceed to the second one. It only has one plugin - **rays** with a value of 0.75. Reducing this value makes the lines of the pattern more subtle:   And the increase gives a result almost indistinguishable from the base:  I returned the original value of 0.75 and changed it to another plugin - **rays2**:   I load the basic parameters and go to the third triangle. It also has one plugin - **julia3D**. In the base fractal, it has a rather large value, greater than 3. The magnification makes the circles at the corners of the quadrilateral more compact:   The decrease greatly affects the pattern, the pattern and coloring changes markedly:   And to change this plug-in I decided to just **julia** and got these here are interesting florets on the corners of the quadrangle:   There are two final triangles left. In the first plugin **hypertile1**. I slightly reduced its meaning and the pattern outside the quadrilateral became fuzzy, and the quadrilateral itself faded:  With an increase in its value, the pattern stretches and begins to predominate over the central quadrangle:  Also this plug-in has add. parameters and their change leads to delightful results:   I replaced this plugin with **blade3D**:   Again I load the basic parameters and go to the second final triangle. It uses the **asteria** plugin. I already know this plugin quite well and I can say with certainty that it is he who forms the quadrangle in the center. The value in the base fractal is the most common = 1. The reduction does not lead to anything good:  Increase too, it seems to me 1 - this is the optimal value:  And additional. the parameter is responsible for rotating the quadrilateral around its axis:  Instead of this plugin I picked up **rosoni**:   Successful experiments! See you soon!
👍 jinotech, jaymz, sociopat, olegst, busy.pay, sbi5, thetroublenotes, sofiahyoplas, marina007, feedyourminnows, kimmysomelove42, aviralpathak, holovision, qurator-tier-1-2, vasilisapor2, thatsrimi, annabel1122, hellen-g-ru, nitrogen, unlonely-soul, fractal-team, joelsegovia, andypalacios, mandolincarls,