http://i.imgsafe.org/75e91b13fa.jpg

Could ETC become an anything goes, governance free network where developers can build application free or any centralised governance or consensus intervention..

This is a question to the community...

I'm not particularly technical when it comes to Cryptocurrency, although I have been a user for the past 3 years and understand the in's and out's of what is going on. I can see the reason that ETC (Ethereum Classic) has come into existence, the 'Hard Fork' was against the spirit of the Ethereum Network, and to call it (ETC) a scam is wrong. Overvalued on the other hand is a completely different matter..

I have been however, struggling with who would use Ethereum Classic, when all the Dev's are working on Ethereum. Would application builders want to operate on a network where, no mean's exist to put right a perceived injustice? Or  maybe without the light governing hand of the Ethereum Foundation and General Consensus, maybe Ethereum Classic stays truer to the mantra set out by Vitalik Buterin for Ethereum...

I was against the 'Hard Fork' even though I was a DAO holder. I see the rise (although, very early days thus far) of ETC as the cost to the Ethereum Foundation intervening in a situation that technically, they shouldn't have. I would accept that, I can see the other side of the argument, and I am happy a lot of new crypto holders (which there were in the DAO) didn't lose everything on their first investment, and in the long term Blockchain technology could certainly benefit for this.

My question to the community is,


# Could Ethereum Classic become likened to the Dark Web? 
## An anything goes, governance free network where developers can build application free or any centralised governance or consensus intervention.

 It feels somewhat similar in nature to the relationship between the dark web and the internet. But I would stress, this is just a thought, and I am more than happy to get an education why I am wrong...

Would be great to hear your view(s) on this...