**one of the main reason why Satoshi would have been a group of people is that Satoshi is very knowledgeable in some wide range of area  such as economics, distributed computing, c++ programming, database and cryptography.**

![images.jpeg](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/honourablefelix/23wCGTtsamixpJbYnu8PqQGWaeKWmrohqfdEVoiCKdJ9LikdvGkygCWNU6JqHi6gdhoZE.jpeg)


When you think about these skillset can you now see that **Satoshi** is a skillset of multiple people instead of individual, for example a c++coder normally would be studying c++, Java, or python just like me lol, but not exactly the history of money. 

I really wish to learn a wide range of topics too but am not an expert in all those field that interest me, most people don't have much time to learn a multiple More skills,**can you now see that Satoshi is a group of multiple people**.lol

![download.jpeg](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/honourablefelix/23w2q1zNfruSmvkjD4d1FqPm1uMUchWDN1Rg9KobnpyDKbqMx4SdpXzTEsnAQtmi2P4hN.jpeg)

>>**How is Satoshi an individual?** The reason why **Satoshi** can be an individual is because is writing style is very consistent. If there were other people Involved they must have follow a certain writing style. **Satoshi** is a brainiac person for example in the Bitcoin white paper he mentions **we propose** instead of **I propose** and on the top of the title the name is written as **Satoshi nakamoto** not **Satoshi's team** or other people's name. And there is only one email address provided for contact.

**Is Satoshi an individual or multiple people?** this question got me.

Thanks for reading



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@honourablefelix/is-satoshi-an-individual-or-multiple-people)</sub></center>