RE: The problem of project delisting and proposed solution by artstein

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @artstein/the-problem-of-project-delisting-and-proposed-solution

·@jringo·
0.000 HBD
Thanks for the write-up!

For further reading, take a look at the two proposed whitelist procedures (including the greylist) that address some of these issues. One is being voted on right now!

[Adding a Project and the Greylist - Voting going on now!](https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/194)

[Delisting a project - Work in Progress Proposal](https://github.com/gridcoin-community/Gridcoin-Tasks/issues/201)

Otherwise, I think you have 2 good points that havn't been discussed at length -- the grace period of a project for when it is greylisted, along with possible continued payout during magnitude decay.

I will post these ideas on the GitHub unless you would like to.

---

Personally, I don't entirely agree with rewarding magnitude decay for a removed project. The goal is to work toward rewarding actual work done. Rewarding decay is not this. 

In addition, I can imagine someone noticing a project will be dewhitelisted in 2-3 weeks, moving their hardware to that project, charging their mag on that project as other people leave the project, and reaping the benefits of a low mag distribution pool as their mag reduces to 0 while their hardware now crunches away on another project.
👍 , , , , , ,