http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_CHG2GRbeET8/TManG_Tz3PI/AAAAAAAAQrY/uboKjeTkZ3M/s1600/read+me.jpg
A brief glance yesterday highlighted that about 5-15% of upvotes result in a view of a given post. This was a small sample, but scary nonetheless. 

Let's be real - aren't we supposed to be upvoting quality content? How can you know if a post is of high quality without reading it? I love the idea of curation rewards, but not when it causes bad articles to go over the moon. 

So my question is: how many of you **actually** read the posts you manually curate? Just drop a reply below, even if you don't want to use an upvote. 

[Image Source](http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2010/10/wednesday-whimsies_27.html?m=1)


Edit: If you content that you read every post i promise I'll check out your trail... And I'll follow the best of the best.