![яйцо.jpg](https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXiwxprFEJma29SGp2Hx6pavGeh8SmaaHN8iHEcNEj3m9)
The logical paradox of using concepts with a fuzzy volume is as follows: "What was before - a chicken or an egg?"
It is necessary to establish a causal relationship! Or in a simple way to find the beginning in this closed circle. On the one hand, for the appearance of a hen, an egg is necessary, on the other - for the appearance of an egg a chicken is needed.
In fact, the task itself is not correctly set, so there is no solution. To establish a causal relationship, you need to have a beginning at least. The first event, which will be the cause. If you find the beginning, then the question disappears by itself. In my opinion, the beginning should be sought not in the chicken and the egg. Egg or chicken is a consequence. Therefore, if the beginning is not in the egg and not in the egg, then following the logic, the cause-and-effect relationship will be this.
                                 **CAUSE - EGG - CHICKEN**
In fact, if we exclude the beginning from our existence, take it beyond the framework of our world, then it is easy to answer any question of the development of our world. From the course of biology, we know that all living things develop from eggs or semen, or spores. And the chicken also appears in the light from the egg. She is given life with one condition. The hen should carry the eggs. Otherwise, its existence is meaningless. If everything is simplified to a cell, the basis of which life consists of, then development takes place in a subsequent way. On the example of a person, after conception and the beginning of the development of the fetus in the womb of a woman, at the earliest stages, ovule (the human analogue of a chicken egg) are born and their number is limited. At the very beginning, the egg multiplies itself like eggs, which eventually appear in the light with the help of a chicken. Chicken is a machine for growing eggs. In no way can the chicken affect the appearance of the egg, except when it hurts in any way the development of the egg.
The conclusion is this, first the egg, and then the chicken.
*But it is also true that the eggs are not taught to the chicken.*