I believe that Bitcoin may become more valuable than gold in both value and utility as time progresses and its adoption grows.

<center>[![bitcoin vs gold.png](https://s27.postimg.org/dlubqypgj/bitcoin_vs_gold.png)](https://postimg.org/image/fdnalv8tb/)</center>

In Spain, they have a saying that goes something like this.

***When the genius points to the moon, the fool looks at the finger.***

I think that saying applies quite appropriately to how many people think of Bitcoin. 

When someone hears about Bitcoin for the first time they tend to focus on one of its features. Either the cryptography of bitcoin or it may be that they're interested in the mining of bitcoin or even who the mysterious creator is, Satoshi Nakamoto.

All of these very interesting features are incredibly attractive and we gravitate to them too quickly, missing the bigger picture of why Bitcoin matters.

## <center>Why Bitcoin Matters</center> ##

I think Bitcoin matters because it may be the best form of money that we have ever seen. It may not be easy for some to notice that because it's still early in its development. 

Bitcoin may do for money what TCPIP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) did for information.

>TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) is the basic communication language or protocol of the Internet. It can also be used as a communications protocol in a private network (either an intranet or an extranet)

Bitcoin today is like TCPIP was in 1992 before there was a browser on the internet and it took a lot of imagination back then to understand how the internet might change the world.

The first way to understand bitcoin, I think, is to understand the history of money and the role of money.

Anthropologists say that there's no evidence of any tribe, much less a civilization, that ever used barter for trade and that should be quite counter-intuitive to most of us because we're taught in school that we first bartered and then we invented money because bartering was too hard.

Well, that's not true. That never happened.

From about 100,000 years ago to about 25,000 years ago, the way we did trade was that everybody in our tribe would know that so and so killed a big buffalo and I would come up to you and say, "Hey, you're not going to eat that whole buffalo. Can I have a little bit of meat." 

They would decide if they wanted to give me some meat or not and other members of the tribe would come and ask them for some meat and they would decide who to give meat to or not and they would have to remember who they gave meat to because they hoped that they would repay them back somehow, sometime in the future.

It was a very subjective system, but that's how trading worked. We all walked around with these subjective ledgers in our mind of who owes us what and hopefully those people eventually repaid us with something that felt fair to us.

As subjective as that system was, we used it for a very long time, for 75,000 years at least, longer than any other system until someone very intelligent in our tribe came up with a new technology, an innovation.

For example, they may have said, "Hey, everybody knows you have a lot of firewood. Can I have some of your firewood?" But this time we're going to pay for it with a new technology. Here are some beads for you.

The man with the firewood responded, "I don't need beads."

"I know you don't need beads but we're going to use these beads to keep track of the debt we owe so we don't have to keep track of it in our heads subjectively anymore", said the buyer, "You just keep the beads and that will be how much you're owed."

It was such a successful technology that it just took off and very quickly, in a couple thousand years, it's impossible to find a tribe or civilization that doesn't have some form of objective ledger. 

<center>[![history of money.png](https://s27.postimg.org/3lnj5opgj/history_of_money.png)](https://postimg.org/image/rpeatz7xb/)</center>

Some tribes chose salt, others chose rocks, seashells, and different forms to keep track of debts in their societies.

Anthropology goes as far as saying that if you describe to them the environment of a tribe, they can easily predict what's going to become a ledger in that tribe because the most important quality of that object will be its scarcity.

That makes sense because if we're going to use something to keep track of debts and it's not scarce, like a leaf on a tree, one could simply pick leaves and create fake debt to benefit oneself at the expense of everybody else.

So scarcity is the most important attribute of this thing to keep track of debt. In fact, there are five attributes that are very important for something to be a good candidate as a currency.

1. **Durability** - *it doesn't decay or corrode*
2. **Transportable** - *easy to carry around*
3. **Divisible** - *capable of being divided*
4. **Recognizable** - *able to be recognized or identified from previous encounters or knowledge*
5. **Fungible** - *able to replace or be replaced by another identical item; mutually interchangeable*

This system took off and worked really well from about 20,000 years ago to about 5,000 years ago.

5,000 years ago tribes began to trade with other tribes and they needed something in common to trade with. One tribe had beads and another tribe had seashells and they couldn't trade and that's when gold emerged as the first universal ledger that could be used by all tribes.

Gold was universally scarce, but it was also transportable. divisible, recognizable and fungible.

In this short post of the history of money, I want to illustrate three myths. If you believe in any of these three myths, it's very difficult to understand the function of money and why Bitcoin matters.

**The first myth** is that money was born out of barter, when actually, it was born out of the need to keep track of debt.

**The second and perhaps biggest myth** is that money is backed by something, when actually, money has never been and will never be backed by anything. It's just a ledger.

People will often tell you that the dollar used to be backed by something, gold. Right now it's not backed by anything, but it used to be gold. But in truth, that implies that gold is backed by something or has some intrinsic value. Gold doesn't have any intrinsic value beyond being a great ledger and very scarce and durable.

We use it for jewelry because of that scarcity and it represents wealth and power and not just because it's pretty.

This is a very common misunderstanding about money, but it's just a ledger, it's not backed by anything.

**The third myth** is that money exists because it's created and sponsored by governments when in truth, it's been around a lot longer than governments have been around and it will be around as long as there are social interactions. It fulfills a very basic social need.

From where we're standing today it's very hard to understand the importance of gold because right now the universal ledger is not gold, it's the US dollar and before that, for about 500 years, we've had various reserve currencies. 

Most recently, the Portuguese escudo, then the Spanish dollar or "pieces of eight", the French franc, the Dutch guilder and then the British pound and now the US dollar. 

All of them have been the universal ledger, the reserve currencies, for about 100 years, but none of them have been anywhere as near as good as keeping their value as gold has.

<center>[![three myths about money.png](https://s29.postimg.org/klepsjwo7/three_myths_about_money.png)](https://postimg.org/image/c359o7q5f/)</center>

If you had $100 USD in the 1800's and you saved it as $100 USD, back then it would have represented as much as a year of someone's yearly income and today it's just $100. If you would have spent that $100 on gold back then, you would have the same value or roughly the equivalent value of a person's yearly income today.

We know of nothing else that is so good at keeping value other than gold. It's quite incredible that the best ledger we have ever found is such a primitive thing that takes billions of dollars to dig it out of the ground and then we lock it in vaults underground again. 

With all the technology we have today. gold remains the only one ledger that we can all use where we're not trusting a government, a person or a bank or company, we're just trusting something really scarce.

About 8 years ago in 2009, Bitcoin was created and it's a universal ledger that serves as digital money in a way in which, just like gold, you don't have to trust anyone. No person, company, bank, or government. 

When you compare Bitcoin to gold, it's incredibly superior in each one of these aspects; scarcity, divisibility, portable, durable, recognizable and fungible. It's superior not by just a little bit, but by a lot.

It's the first time in the last 5,000 years we've had anything that is immensely superior to gold and what makes it so much better than gold is that there will never be more than 21 million Bitcions, period. It's mathematically perfect scarcity. You can trust it.

As with Bitcoin, we mine more gold every year, about 2000 tons a year.

In terms of the divisibility, bitcoin is composed of a million pieces called bits, so a million bits are one bitcoin making it easily divisible.

The portability is also very important, Up until now, if you want to do a transaction with anyone with a dollar or a gold coin, you can easily walk up to them, hand them a dollar and you have completed the transaction without any third party involvement, but the moment you want to do a transaction with someone who's not in the room, we always need a third party. 

That has been the case forever. That's how banks got started and today we have things like credit cards, PayPal, etc. It's just been impossible to do a transaction with someone else over a distance without both of us trusting a third party, a middle man.

What is remarkable about Bitcoin is that it allows us to do a transaction with anyone else on the planet, even if you don't know them, in real-time, for free, without any third party and without any added trust.

Think about that for a second. We can call someone right now in Hong Kong on Skype, we can hear them, see them and communicate with them live, but if we wanted to send them 1 cent, it just wasn't possible. The few ways we've had to send someone 1 cent across the world would cost so much and take so long it would not be worth the effort.

With bitcoin you can move a cent or a billion dollars just as quickly and just as cheaply. It's the first time in 5,000 years that we have something immensely superior to any form of money we have seen until now.

The three functions of money when money works well is:

1. Store of value - a way of saving
2. Payment mechanism - a way of paying
3. Unit of account - a way of pricing

<center>[![three functions of money.png](https://s23.postimg.org/4rm3mjoln/three_functions_of_money.png)](https://postimg.org/image/66nob9pon/)</center>

I think these are the ways that Bitcoin is going to develop. Most people that have Bitcoin today are using it as a way of saving. They're not using it for paying so much. In 2014 only about 7 million people were using Bitcoin so there were not many people you can transact with, but the numbers of people using it are growing exponentially.

Most of those people are using bitcoin because they believe in bitcoin and they want to save it. I think the good thing about the saving function of bitcoin is that if you want to buy some bitcoin, you don't need anyone's permission to accept it. You just buy some bitcoin and hold them.

For Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrncy to be used for payment, a lot of people need to accept it. I think that once we have enough people that have bitcoin for other reasons, it will become an improved, payment mechanism and if it's used enough as a payment mechanism, it's only natural that it also becomes a way to price things.

Since its launch date in 2009, Bitcoin didn't gain a lot of traction until 2011 and more people are using it every day and it's one of the most important social experiments going on right now and I think it matters because there is a good  chance that over the next 20 years, we finally, after 5,000 years can replace the trust of the gold standard with a completely new standard, the Bitcoin standard. 

This may not, and possibly should not, replace any national currencies, but it's likely to become the native, international currency of the internet and will mark the biggest leap forward in the democratization of money.

---

### Related posts ###

[How Blockchain Technology Can Help The Internet Of Things](https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@luzcypher/how-blockchain-technology-can-help-the-internet-of-things)

[Programmable Trust For The Internet Of Things How Bitcoin Is Transforming The Way We Do Business ](https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@luzcypher/programmable-trust-for-the-internet-of-things-how-bitcoin-is-transforming-the-way-we-do-business )

[Bitcoin Vs Banks Technological Disruption Can Revolutionize Banking ](https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@luzcypher/bitcoin-vs-banks-technological-disruption-can-revolutionize-banking )

[Five Ways Smart Contracts On A Blockchain Are Changing The Way We Do Business ](https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@luzcypher/five-ways-smart-contracts-on-a-blockchain-are-changing-the-way-we-do-business )

[Blockchain Is Killing The Middleman Real Trust In A Virtual World ](https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@luzcypher/blockchain-is-killing-the-middleman-real-trust-in-a-virtual-world )

[Today I Learned More About Bitcoin And Blockchain Technology](https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@luzcypher/today-i-learned-more-about-bitcoin-and-blockchain-technology)

---

<center>[![luzcypher-emoji-verified-2.png](https://s16.postimg.org/fg72y0snp/luzcypher_emoji_verified_2.png)](https://steemit.com/@luzcypher)</center>