Monkey is his human origin ... not the opposite!

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@mars9·
0.000 HBD
Monkey is his human origin ... not the opposite!
<html>
<p><strong>Our eyes have drawn a vision of human evolution based on Darwin's &nbsp;theory, which represents our conversion from primitive primordial ism, &nbsp;but the research on the skeleton of a primitive fossilized man 3.7 &nbsp;million years ago may prove that the course of evolution we know is &nbsp;wrong and should be reversed</strong><br>
At &nbsp;the British Science Festival in Swansea, Professor Robin Compton &nbsp;explained that humans, monkeys and chimpanzees evolved from a common &nbsp;ancestor who walked upright and lived in trees. So &nbsp;the chimpanzees changed their body shape so they could move quickly &nbsp;using their four limbs, while people continued to use only two limbs. It is not true that straight walking evolved after humans descended &nbsp;from the trees to move around the open savanna areas. Man walked &nbsp;millions of years earlier.<br>
In &nbsp;fact, Professor Compton believes that the use of tools, which is a &nbsp;human characteristic, began to develop when primitive man lived on &nbsp;trees, and when he walked on his feet, he used his hands to cling to &nbsp;nearby branches in order to stabilize his steps, gradually became aware &nbsp;of different uses of sticks . "This &nbsp;image is drawn on one of my t-shirts We have learned that evolution &nbsp;happened in this way, but I will try to convince you that it happened &nbsp;in the opposite way, and no matter what," he said. The idea seemed strange and uncomfortable to us, but chimpanzees and &nbsp;humans come from more human-like ancestors than chimpanzees<br>
He &nbsp;added that modern man is still like our ancestor who lived in the &nbsp;forest and we can go back to live there if we learn how, we are not &nbsp;animals left the trees. "So, have we really moved from living in trees to living on the &nbsp;ground?" In fact, we did not leave the trees and we can go back to them &nbsp;easily if we want to and we decided to take off our shoes<br>
The most perfect</p>
<p><img src="http://162.13.30.35/Web/elaphweb/Resources/images/Politics/2016/9/week1/3162-1.jpg"/><br>
<a href="http://162.13.30.35/Web/elaphweb/Resources/images/Politics/2016/9/week1/3162-1.jpg"> Source image&nbsp;&nbsp;</a> <br>
In &nbsp;the 1990s, in South Africa, old fossils of human anthropophilus were &nbsp;found, the same species as the famous Lucy, but not dated until last &nbsp;year. While the length of Lucy was 1.1 meters, the size of the African &nbsp;fossil known as Little Foot was close to the size of a contemporary &nbsp;Western woman<br>
According to Professor Krompton, Flossy was a dwarf of Australopithecus, just like the dwarfs of modern man. Little Foot is the most perfect Australopithecus that has been created, so that its legs are almost the same.<br>
Professor &nbsp;Crompton is an expert in the use of computer modeling to simulate &nbsp;walking. He has studied Lucy for 20 years and is planning today to use &nbsp;Little Foot's dimensions to determine how she walked. Twenty years ago, he sparked international controversy because he was &nbsp;the first to declare that Lucy was as straight as modern man, and based &nbsp;his conclusion on computer models, and he is now confident that Little &nbsp;Foot will put an end to this controversy<br>
The &nbsp;skeletal structure of the Little Foot is the perfect one to this day. &nbsp;The front end is completely full and has only one hand, and the legs are &nbsp;almost perfect," he told the Independent newspaper. He &nbsp;stressed that they would build a model on the computer without having &nbsp;to guess the size, because they know the lengths of Little Foot &nbsp;precisely, so they can discover how they walked. "We have started implementing a small part of this project, and we are &nbsp;rebuilding the basin area because it was in a rather bad situation," he &nbsp;said<br>
similarity<br>
<img src="http://162.13.30.35/Web/elaphweb/Resources/images/Politics/2016/9/week1/979637_a2f4_625x1000.jpg"/></p>
<p>&nbsp;<a href="http://162.13.30.35/Web/elaphweb/Resources/images/Politics/2016/9/week1/979637_a2f4_625x1000.jpg">Source image&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</a></p>
<p>As &nbsp;for the recent study published by Nature about Lucy's death after &nbsp;falling from a tree because she was not proficient in living on trees, &nbsp;she was walking on her feet. Professor Crompton ruled out this theory &nbsp;and pointed out that we have ample evidence that the chimpanzees and the &nbsp;unseen monkeys were Trees are sometimes subjected to serious wounds. He pointed out that some academics disagree with him and still believe &nbsp;Lucy is on her four limbs, but their number is decreasing day by day.<br>
The &nbsp;proponents of the theory of evolution of human mobility over time until &nbsp;he walks straight and steady on the ground, that human foot is the best &nbsp;proof of that. It has long been thought of as fixed and not like soft gorilla feet. But &nbsp;Professor Crompton and other scientists have found evidence that the &nbsp;muscles and tendons are the ones that keep our feet solid and not the &nbsp;bones that hold them tight. "So &nbsp;the human foot is as soft as the feet of other monkeys, and it is like &nbsp;the gorilla foot, and its characteristics do not indicate that it has &nbsp;adapted to our transition to living on Earth, so we typically resemble &nbsp;the primates and have their feet</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Interested in this @gavvet</p>
</html>
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,