Should a reader be allowed to make a plot conjecture?
writing·@mgaft1·
0.000 HBDShould a reader be allowed to make a plot conjecture?
<center> <img src="https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/03/15/13/14/brain-2146167_960_720.jpg" width="960" height="493"> </center> <center> <a href="https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/03/15/13/14/brain-2146167_960_720.jpg">Source</a> </center> <p>Many times, I heard an opinion that a story should be written in a way that a reader could make a "conjecture" on its plot line. “Don’t tell them what happens. Let them come to their own conclusion." In other words, this conjecture is equated with the idea that a plot line could and sometimes needs to be unfinished, as though we present a reader to cavities in a plot to make a filament of their own.</p> <center> <img src="https://im1.shutterfly.com/ng/services/mediarender/THISLIFE/010041648033/media/103043017168/small/1498499333/enhance" width="800" height="139"> </center> <p>Rather I would like to clarify what, from my point of view, qualifies as conjecture and what’s not.</p> <p> Many times, I’ve met an obviously unfinished work with the holes in a plot, which the author explained as giving a reader the opportunity to fill them out. One story comes to mind where a protagonist gets in trouble in many life avenues at the same time, his nervous system not holding up, he throws a major tantrum where he is not supposed to and his hopes and life goals fall like the house of cards. The subsequent part of the story starts when the protagonist is already on the elevated part of his career, recalls about all his past difficulties with a thin smile on his lips. </p> <p>This development reminded me the old joke about a pilot that learned aerial acrobatics from a learn-it-yourself magazine and got as far as an "air spin." Then the magazine said "…and to exit from spin routine we will publish in the next issue of the magazine."</p> <center> <img src="http://www.s0alex.ru/img27/ab17-1063.jpg" width="280" height="220"> </center> <center> <a href="http://www.s0alex.ru/img27/ab17-1063.jpg">Source</a> </center> <p>In my opinion, such ambiguities are nothing than author’s shortcomings. In that case, what is the true conjecture? I’ll offer a couple of examples from the known masters of the short stories…</p> <p>One of my favorite O Henry's stories is called <a href="http://www.online-literature.com/o_henry/1303/">The Last Leaf</a> It's about a very frail girl sick with pneumonia, who sat by the window of her room noticing, how the leaves were falling from the tree across from her window under the Autumn rain, and have gotten the dangerous idea into your head. This idea was that once the last leaf will fall off the tree she will die. </p> <p>As the autumn advanced, more and more leaves fell off the tree until only the last one remained. But that stubborn leaf kept on staying and staying despite the wind, rain, and snow. That kept the girl alive through the winter and when finally, the sprint came, she got well. Finally came the time when she opened the window only to find out that the leaf was painted on the window. </p> <p>It turned out that an old painter living on the lower floor painted the leaf on her window in the day when the last leaf on the tree has fallen.</p> <p>As you can see the plot line of the story was very clearly defined at the last detail. And yet, because the story is so touching, you (at least, I was and still) continue conjecturing long after I'm done reading. I am thinking about life and death, about sacrifice, about the power of belief that sometimes defy medicine. And I am trying not to think of this story in a presence of someone, just in case, they might notice tears in my eyes.</p> <p>The next story I'd like to discuss is called <a href="http://www.standardsinstitutes.org/sites/default/files/material/winter16_ela_9-12_day_2_session_1-macomber.pdf">The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber</a> by Ernest Hemingway <br> <br> This is the story about becoming a phenomenon of becoming an adult once a person overcomes his fear. In the story, Francis Macomber feels a paralyzing fear of a lion and in a stressful situation during the lion hunt, he shamefully runs away from the animal in the eyes of his wife, a professional hunter of the safari and the locals. Later in camp on all these people feel a complete contempt for him including his wife, who cheats on his at night with the hunter.</p> <p>Next day though Francis is no filled with shame that he has no fear when he hunts buffalos. In that moment of truth, he turns from the old boy he was all his life into a man. <br> <br> The story ends tragically. In that moment of spiritual euphoria, Francis's wife shoots and kills him. She realizes that now when he became a man he won't allow her anymore to treat him like a boy and will come true on his promises to divorce her on the grounds of her multiple infidelities. Something that he never had the nerve to do before. Thus, she would have lost much money; not only the money, her dominating position in the relationship. </p> <p>So again, from the point of view of the plot development, everything in this narrative is complete, shown in details, to what's called "stingy fullness." Yet after the story is read you continue thinking about the whole situation, about the roles of man and a woman, about coming to adulthood and about the irony separating life and death. </p> <p>What conclusion can I draw from all of this? When a writer is possessed by some situation or a character, he or she writes the way they see it and feel. If what inspired the writer also hits the nerve with the reader, it causes an emotional response. The story stays with the reader and continues to affect his mind and soul, as these two stories continue to live inside me. This type of writing is my ultimate goal.</p> <p>It seems that a writer can and should worry about his work being understood. However, I don't think one should worry about tailoring the story in such a way that a reader would have an alternate explanation of theme or a plot.<br> <br> Whether you like the story or not is a different matter. Here everything depends on the emotional perception. Yet I don't think there is need to develop theories of offering a reader a deliberate possibility to conjecture.</p> <p>At least, this is my opinion.</p>