Hello, everyone! Recently, a case occurred in the town of Karpinsk, which confirms, that CPS can take children from the family on the basis of bruising and anonymous complaints.  In the Sverdlovsk region six days ago, from the family Savchenko CPS tooks five children. Took away coolly, cynically, without having submitted any documents on the basis of which so radical actions were made. Since February 26, children are in the infectious diseases department of the central city clinical hospital, on the same floor as the tuberculosis department, and despite the fact, that the legality of their stay there is in question, all responsible persons, apparently, satisfied with this state of things.

![f31da729_resizedScaled_1020to574.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmSfkx8v72ASwLzgefX3TLYGZTorBGxbx3nMkcAcEnntWH/f31da729_resizedScaled_1020to574.jpg)

From the outside it may seem a wilderness, but that's the way things are going. Come guardianship officials and police officers, select children, do not make any decisions and charges, refer to the received signal and the need for verification and a week keep children in the hospital. And this can happen to every family, because all this is called juvenile justice, which in Russia "is not". Juvenile justice is a system of laws, that places the rights of the child above those of the family. Thus the rights of the child are defined by officials from guardianship at own discretion and if necessary take away children out of court. And juvenile justice is a ban on education, since from the point of view of juvenile any education violates the rights of the child. Made daughter's reprimand — "psychological" violence, prohibited use of a computer and not given money for the movie because of unlearned lessons — made "economic" violence" against a child, slapped for the fact, that son stole a trifle from your pocket, but he committed physical violence against obviously weak "from personal hostility". It seems to us, that we are raising children, we want to make them better, so that they learn well and grow up honest citizens, and juvenile justice advocates believe, that the biggest enemies of children are their own parents. In this sense, the incident in Karpinsk is an exemplary template for the implementation of juvenile technologies in Russia.

In the evening of 26.  February at 20:50 local time on the door knocked  CPS across the city of Karpinsk accompanied by four employees patrulno-sentry duty and two representatives of division for minors. As reported Ivan Savchenko (father), they literally broke into the apartment and in the categorical form has demanded to put children to transport them to the city hospital. The parents protest, they asked "not to aggravate the situation" and threatened Ivan to take him, not to the hospital, and the police. Ivan, remembering, that he had problems with the law, didn't begin to show any resistance, and called on the RVS hot line and according to the instruction of the operator made video of selection. Having seen it, the employee of management of social protection Olga Ivanovna Felix declared, that record "is illegal". And this is a very strange statement, as every citizen in his own home has the right to conduct audio or video. But the actions of social protection employees, indeed, raise questions.

![regnum_picture_152022961821439_big.jpg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmQVg36b6SeUvM1rmHfwgr45FusadHuPwzerFiGJBCteVo/regnum_picture_152022961821439_big.jpg)

They did not submit any documents or regulations. After selection of children any "papers" didn't make and didn't suggest to write. Leaving, they ordered mother to come next day to bodies of guardianship and guardianship to write "voluntary" the application for placement of all children in socially-the rehabilitation center. What's the meaning of that? This means, that if the mother signed such a statement, the employees of the social protection would refer to the fact that "she asked" to put the children in the center "for social rehabilitation." But now their actions raise questions. What is the name of the selection of children without legal grounds? Right, the kidnapping. If employees of social protection are referring to the police checks on the fact of signal to the police, why they took the kids away, not the perpetrator? And if the children were taken only in order to conduct the test examination and interviews (all this can be done in a couple days), why they still keep in the hospital? Are they hostages? Anyway, the relevant requests were sent by the social worker in all instances, but at the moment, the official responses were not received.


At the moment it is known, that the child called police and reported, that in a family allegedly beat children. Who called - not specified. Moreover, the guardianship authorities previously received a signal, that one of the children in late January had a bruise under his eye. As reported by the parents, it all happened by accident: children were playing, and one of them hit. Thus Ivan Savchenko in general was in hospital and learned about it after discharge from the hospital.

CPS said to Svetlana Savchenko officials, that the children will be returned, only if Ivan Savchenko leave the family and move. And that this is not an invasion of privacy? And how to be Svetlana alone with children from 2 to 14 years? And though at the moment, apparently, no criminal case against Ivan is brought, but the cause of incident, probably, was that it brought up children, that is didn't show indifference to their destiny, but from the point of view of juvenile consciousness it committed violence.

Who hasn't believed, that the CPS can take the kids away because of bruising and anonymous complaint without trial and evidence? I think, that this story is great another example.

Thank for reading! 


30% of earnings from this post (after curation) will be transferred to the community.



https://regnum.ru/news/2386978.html
Image:
https://66.ru/news/society/208844/