Why did Lord Curlyle send back to India?

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@ojhorsrabon·
0.000 HBD
Why did Lord Curlyle send back to India?
![Lord-Carlisle.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU9KQtKG6BKnnTTHDycuteAQYsbWsm8Qd4vAb4mVgyndJ/Lord-Carlisle.jpg)Air India's Heathrow to Delhi flight 162 had landed on Wednesday night late in twenty minutes. After a little over eleven a night, the flight came from London, there was a passenger who had put a foot in Delhi, the Indian authorities did not want it at all. But he had an Indian business visa. For this reason, the Indian flagship carrier Air India allowed him to fly on the air without any restrictions.

The elderly, gentleman, Lord Alexander Karlil, the name of the gentleman He is a senior member of Britain's House of Lords, prominent lawyer. However, another identity of her, BNP leader Khaleda Zia, who was recently detained in Bangladesh, has also been appointed as one of the lawyers, and she has put her foot in Delhi.

A day before the arrival, he told the BBC, how Khaleda Zia is being harassed and accused of 'political purpose', when she came to Delhi and presented her to the media, her intention was to present them. He has been hanging in his Bangladeshi visa application because he wants to attend the press conference in Delhi instead of Dhaka.
But the kind of diplomatic activity that started between Delhi and Dhaka since its inception was unprecedented, it was also unprecedented. The Government of Bangladesh said, if Lord Carlisle spoke about Khaleda Zia's case in New Delhi, then it would be on the ground in Delhi, a 'paid political campaign' - that is, the political campaign that runs with money.

India can not use 'their soil to promote anti-propaganda' in this way, the attitude of Dhaka was made clear to Delhi. Unable to enter India, Lord Carlisle returned to London and conveyed a video from there. There he claimed to the Delhi media, that the Bangladesh Foreign Secretary summoned the acting High Commissioner of India to Dhaka and told him about his acrimonious objection.

Whether it is true or not, the event is planned by Lord Curlyle in Delhi, which has been a hindrance from the very beginning. As was initially decided, he will hold a press conference on July 13 at Foreign Correspondents Club (FCC) in Delhi. But on the same day, the Korean ambassador was coming to FCC, by giving this argument, they canceled the booking of Lord Carlisle.

By force, he arranged alternative vans in a five star hotel in Delhi - the press conference was also brought forward one day. But there were more dramas left at Delhi airport on Wednesday night.

According to Lord Carlisle's comment, "When I came to Delhi on my phone, I was sent a message to see that my visa was canceled. At the immigration counter, I was informed that I can not be allowed to enter India. "
"Frankly, the immigration staff were very polite and humble, they treated me very beautifully. But there was no answer to them why I could not be allowed to enter, "said Lord Carlisle at the video press conference.

India's answer came in a little while. Foreign Ministry spokesman Rabish Kumar said, "Lord Cairl has applied for a visa by showing the reasons why - and the real purpose of his visit - because there is no connotation between him, we have decided to withdraw his visa."

Later in the afternoon, he added, "Lord Karlil has tried to create misunderstandings between India and Bangladesh - there is reason to doubt that." Even he wants to create suspicion about Bangladesh's opposition (BNP) with India, Rabish Kumar .

The spokesman said, Lord Carlisle knew very well that he would have to go back - that's why he came with British Airways flight 'Return Boarding Pass'.

Although the British lawmaker is not unanimous with this argument. In London on Thursday morning, he said that his Indian visa was checked at least twice in Heathrow - but there was no discrepancy.

Lord Carlisle also called the British Deputy High Commissioner to India from Delhi Airport for whether the Indian government could be allowed to enter Delhi by convincing the government. But according to Lord Carlisle's claim, he also expressed his helplessness - and made clear that there is no scope for India's decision to move.

Shortly afterwards, he was aboard the British Airways landing in London. Just two hours into London, at Skype call, he met at a video conference with Delhi's media.

Lord Curlyle said, "My respect for Indian democracy has been shattered. They should be ashamed of their way of acting under political pressure and the way they treated the 70-year-old parliamentarian, it should be apologetic. "

He will tell the entire matter in a very detailed press conference in London very soon, he said. Lord Carlisle also added that only a young porter helped him in that little time he was at the Indian airport. "The use of one person in India fascinates me".

He was on the ground in Delhi for three hours. But the amount of bribe about India, Bangladesh, and probably the UK around those three hours - is rarely seen!
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,