POLIAC'21 Winter Edition - Day 22

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@poliac·
0.000 HBD
POLIAC'21 Winter Edition - Day 22
<div class="text-justify">


![P21D22.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/poliac/EowHa154Vw3jUcDXGeVdbx8F1uLYmwsqLfAsfNnvnoA5QFh5KgCZ8doHXnMtgh5PKue.png)


***

**Twenty-second round with an average step count of 15967 and attendance above 95%.**

> *[POL] Dwudziesta drugi runda z przeciętną liczbą kroków 15967 i frekwencją powyżej 95%.*

***

![GOLDEN.jpg](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/poliac/48QuB6Gketj9EMGizseo6L8y5bgBFw6P7VUcpGLS3j9MhU3zuad2LjNjPjV8UZJFui.jpg)

**A day of great rematches, four players won their second match against their rival, five others enjoyed a successful rematch for their defeat in the first match. @sk1920 definitely improved on his score from the first duel with @racibo, but it was far too little to beat the Danzig player. The first duel between @benbow2017 and @manuvert was very evenly matched, but it was @manuvert who enjoyed the win. In the second match the roles were reversed, @benbow2017 won decisively. The start of the season was unlucky for @cezary-io, he couldn't win the match for a long time, so @danmaruschak handled him easily, in the rematch the roles were reversed, now @danmaruschak got unlucky, which was exploited by the Pole. @homesteadlt made a combative approach to the first match against @erikklok, but it was not enough, the Dutchman was better then. The Lithuanian took a relaxed approach to the rematch and that proved to be the key to success. A completely different attitude was displayed by @fredkese, who had a disastrous performance in the first match against @timehacker, but approached the rematch with full commitment, after all, he counts in the fight for the championship and it would be silly to lose the battle at his own request.**

> *[POL] Dzień wielkich rewanżów, czterech graczy wygrało drugi mecz ze swoim rywalem, pięciu innych cieszyło się z udanego rewanżu za porażkę w pierwszym meczu. @sk1920 zdecydowanie poprawił swój wynik z pierwszego pojedynku z @racibo, ale to było stanowczo za mało do pokonania gdańszczanina. Pierwszy pojedynek między @benbow2017 i @manuvert był bardzo wyrównany, ale to @manuvert cieszyła się z wygranej. W drugim meczu role się odwróciły, @benbow2017 wygrał zdecydowanie. Początek sezonu był pechowy dla @cezary-io, długo nie potrafił wygrać meczu, dlatego @danmaruschak poradził sobie z nim bez problemu, w rewanżu role się odwróciły, teraz @danmaruschak dopadł pech, co zostało wykorzystane przez Polaka. @homesteadlt bojowo przystąpił do pierwszego meczu z @erikklok, ale to nie wystarczyło, wtedy lepszy był Holender. Do rewanżu Litwin podszedł na spokojnie i to okazało się kluczem do sukcesu. Zupełnie inne nastawienie zaprezentował @fredkese, w pierwszym meczu z @timehacker zaliczył fatalny występ, ale do rewanżu podszedł z pełnym zaangażowaniem, przecież liczy się w walce o mistrzostwo i głupio by było przegrać walkę na własne życzenie.*  




![screenshot-docs.google.com-2025.01.22-15_47_09.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/poliac/23t8AwWWaRvGS9EzzqaAyNoeVZTHsrEDgkJwdey5g7oCoPxQTfZrcdVYnS4MUbj3RKaRG.png)



|	Round 22	|	2025-01-20	|	Results			|
|	-	|	-	|		-		|
|	@sk1920	|	**@racibo**	|	20063	-	**35348**	|
|	**@benbow2017**	|	@manuvert	|	**37195**	-	15737	|
|	@trezzahn	|	**@ptaku**	|	1002	-	**48180** (SPB)	|
|	@danmaruschak	|	**@cezary-io**	|	14718	-	**18046**	|
|	@browery	|	**@actifit-godfish**	|	11679	-	**13306**	|
|	@jjprac	|	**@bucipuci**	|	15679	-	**50014**	|
|	@erikklok	|	**@homesteadlt**	|	6000	-	**11226**	|
|	@timehacker	|	**@fredkese**	|	10915	-	**26512**	|
|	@merthin	|	**@new.things**	|	29002	-	**30926**	|

**Best score in Golden League - @bucipuci - 100 AFIT
Best score among losers - @merthin - 100 AFIT**

# TABLE GOLDEN LEAGUE

|	#	|	Player	|	Points	|	For	|	Against	|
|	-	|	-	|	-	|	-	|	-	|
|	1	|	@new.things	|	60	|	685757	|	425553	|
|	2	|	@fredkese	|	54	|	524462	|	355147	|
|	3	|	@bucipuci	|	48	|	612516	|	401602	|
|	4	|	@ptaku	|	48	|	567375	|	427597	|
|	5	|	(+1) @benbow2017	|	45	|	606537	|	516354	|
|	6	|	(-1) @merthin	|	45	|	537606	|	425552	|
|	7	|	@racibo	|	45	|	520618	|	389079	|
|	8	|	@manuvert	|	42	|	459014	|	411259	|
|	9	|	@danmaruschak	|	39	|	537149	|	443328	|
|	10	|	@actifit-godfish	|	33	|	418041	|	439643	|
|	11	|	@browery	|	30	|	343344	|	394526	|
|	12	|	@cezary-io	|	27	|	378506	|	430429	|
|	13	|	(+1) @homesteadlt	|	21	|	257538	|	335346	|
|	14	|	(-1) @sk1920	|	18	|	277016	|	404334	|
|	15	|	@erikklok	|	15	|	278306	|	459737	|
|	16	|	@timehacker	|	15	|	258423	|	423954	|
|	17	|	@trezzahn	|	6	|	113915	|	446979	|
|	18	|	@jjprac	|	3	|	251305	|	497009	|

# GOLDEN LEAGUE **[Schedule](https://tournamentscheduler.net/schedule/MTY1MjYyMDIxMjY)**
**[Ranking table](https://tournamentscheduler.net/schedule/MTY1MjYyMDIxMjY/results)** for GOLDEN LEAGUE

****

![SILVER.jpg](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/poliac/48Pw3BzruXjevR7myjqQ4brVWZAwixyYfsxqqRgvkm78xjRQBx2mPJfHXpVRS78AEM.jpg)

**Three players enjoyed a successful rematch in this round. It saddens me to have to disqualify @kap1 from participating next season. The rules clearly state that you have to post a minimum of 50% of reports during the season. Currently her attendance is 47%, and that's only if she publishes all the reports by the end of the season. It's a pity, because @kap1 has shown in several matches that she can fight, plus she is the current SL record holder. The battle between the leaders continues at its best, @silvertop has made up a few steps to @itz.inno, they are currently separated by a difference of 595 steps in favour of the Japanese player.**

> *[POL] W tej rundzie trzech gracz cieszyło się z udanego rewanżu. Smuci mnie konieczność dyskwalifikacji @kap1 z udziału w przyszłym sezonie. Regulamin jasno określa, że trzeba opublikować minimum 50% raportów w trakcie sezonu. Obecnie jej frekwencja wynosi 47%, i to tylko w momencie, kiedy będzie publikowała wszystkie raporty do końca sezonu. Szkoda, bo @kap1 pokazała w kilku meczach, że potrafi walczyć, dodatkowo jest aktualnie rekordzistką SL. Walka między liderami trwa w najlepsze, @silvertop odrobił kilka kroków straty do @itz.inno, obecnie dzieli ich różnica 595 kroków na korzyść Japończyka.*

![screenshot-docs.google.com-2025.01.22-15_47_40.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/poliac/23tSwyUiSHgS27Co8dDHNVncYmgKmhxG19x8UuEPXU8ePnHdiPb5NfUYpD17qJ1u8XP9j.png)

|	Round 22	|	2025-01-20	|	Results			|
|	-	|	-	|		-		|
|	**@pinkhub**	|	@alovely088	|	**14459**	-	13208	|
|	@davidthompson57	|	**@kap1**	|	6359	-	**14857**	|
|	@awah	|	**@atongis**	|	5773	-	**11487**	|
|	**@mushanov**	|	@svanbo	|	**8793**	-	3672	|
|	@asia-pl	|	**@silvertop**	|	8411	-	**11518**	|
|	@cryptospa	|	**@krakonos**	|	0	-	**11907**	|
|	@pjansen	|	**@elizabethbit**	|	10482	-	**10533**	|
|	**@itz.inno**	|	@stefannikolov	|	**10896**	-	7032	|

**Best score in Silver League - @kap1 - 100 AFIT 
Best score among losers - @alovely088 - 100 AFIT**

# TABLE SILVER LEAGUE

|	#	|	Player	|	Points	|	For	|	Against	|
|	-	|	-	|	-	|	-	|	-	|
|	1	|	@itz.inno	|	63	|	339658	|	196499	|
|	2	|	@silvertop	|	63	|	339063	|	197116	|
|	3	|	(+2) @cryptospa	|	42	|	288538	|	205391	|
|	4	|	(-1) @mushanov	|	42	|	239494	|	231520	|
|	5	|	(-1) @atongis	|	42	|	238992	|	201952	|
|	6	|	@pinkhub	|	39	|	242547	|	213834	|
|	7	|	@elizabethbit	|	39	|	228474	|	201682	|
|	8	|	@pjansen	|	33	|	220733	|	233910	|
|	9	|	@awah	|	33	|	176589	|	214613	|
|	10	|	@stefannikolov	|	30	|	154305	|	223857	|
|	11	|	@davidthompson57	|	28	|	203612	|	207255	|
|	12	|	(+1) @krakonos	|	21	|	197783	|	219425	|
|	13	|	(-1) @alovely088	|	21	|	194668	|	205986	|
|	14	|	@asia-pl	|	15	|	170286	|	227572	|
|	15	|	@svanbo	|	10	|	76798	|	174969	|
|	16	|	@kap1	|	6	|	70836	|	226795	|

SILVER LEAGUE **[Schedule](https://tournamentscheduler.net/schedule/MTY1MjYyMjY4MTY)**
**[Ranking table](https://tournamentscheduler.net/schedule/MTY1MjYyMjY4MTY/results)** for SILVER LEAGUE

***

![Piotr A. Marszalek.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/poliac/48VjJKjCbTNxKRJdiX96fnUTYxLbAjTzFApZzJESdeSG5ffcCYxtpNiNdgSazncsCx.png)

</div> 
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,