![image](https://img.esteem.ws/jw1mpukhxn.jpg)
[image source
](https://i2.wp.com/bigganpotrika.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/maxresdefault.jpg?fit=1280%2C720)
Before setting off to the turtle speed, how about we take a little Catch 22. Maybe the most delightful case of Catch 22 is the point at which you say "I don't know anything". In any case, you quite slightest realize that you don't know anything. That is, the conundrum is a clashing articulation. 

Another excellent case of Catch 22 is found in a story by Miguel de Cervantes' "Wear Quixote" book. There is a bizarre city where the city watch is a tough people. At whatever point anybody goes to the city, he is requested to go to his city. On the off chance that he once gave a false answer, at that point quickly his voice was heard. Closing is scattered. In this way, one day a man came to visit the city. Of course, she requesting that he go to the city. The backstabber answered, "I have come to hold tight." The city monitor was in incredible peril. On the off chance that he holds false assertions, at that point he will be hanged as indicated by the tenets of the city. Again hanging in the hanging, the more abnormal will be a reality. 

Not just this town watch, the renowned Greek rationalist Socrates was assaulted by Catch 22s. Presently how about we hear his story a bit. Furthermore, with that, the narrative of turtle movement will likewise be called. 

In antiquated Greece, researchers, for example, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and numerous different researchers did not come alone. Subsequent to investigating information, they brought up various issues. Once in a while, the contentions of science were sent to the war, Pandits. At around 445 BCE, at the time Athens came to Parminidius. Alongside his educate, The point was to thwart the ascent of Pythagorean philosophy. 

Geno Paradox was really: One day, Vir Ekilis was strolling on the seafront. Indeed, the Greek saint Achilles had fallen on the leader of the olive-leaf rivalry (Old Olympics) in the Olympic race rivalry. Amid a stroll on the seafront, a savage Turtle tested him to race with himself. The main condition was that he needed to begin fleeing from the front. Bir Ekilis is an executioner. With small turtles or verification of her self-intrigue! However, he concurred. 

The minute that the race will begin, the turtle was called Vaaya Skills, in the event that I can demonstrate that you can not vanquish me, will you acknowledge the rate? Achilles is amazed. He said yes on the off chance that you can demonstrate by a rationale that I will never win, at that point what is the utilization of simply running? I concur with the rate. 

The fiendish Turtle vanquished his countrymen Ekalisake Mahabila Ekilis Obviously, Acilis needed to acknowledge the rate. In any case, what was the intelligent turtle? To comprehend the turtle's rationale, there are a couple of things to know about. The first is the separation between the turtle and the Achille, and the Pythagorean teaching. In the event that the race is believed to be in a straight line, at that point it will be that the minute Aisi will touch the turtle, the separation between them will be zero. That is, to touch the turtle must be between the separation between them. We should take a smidgen of Pythorian tenet. 

In the Pythagorean theater, the place is thought to be the whole of the purposes of time, and the time is thought to be a little pitch mix. The aggregate number of room and time can be separated into endless little territories. We should clear this with the assistance of a little progression. 

                                  I ------------ T. 

I think IT is a straight line. As indicated by Pythagorean folklore, IT is the whole of numerous focuses. Yet, the issue is what number of are really? His answer is an unending number (however not a boundless number. Unending is only a lovely idea).
 ![image](https://img.esteem.ws/mdwc9cyyl6.jpg)
[image source](https://i0.wp.com/bigganpotrika.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/1-2.png?w=537)
Presently we are prepared to comprehend the turtle's rationale. The turtle's rationale was really: Because the turtles began running from the front, at that point Achilles must cross the forward separation before intersection the turtle. Suppose that not long after the beginning of the race, Achilles crossed the separation. Yet, around then the tortoises did not stay there. He likewise proceeded around then. Along these lines, to get the turtle, you need to conquer the separation of the turtle ahead. Indeed, even around then, the turtle won't sit, yet he will go somewhat further. From that point onward, when Achilles can get the turtle, at that point the turtle will go somewhat further. This will proceed. 

Simply envision, Ekilis and Turtle partook in the hustling rivalry on a basic line. Since the straight line is the entirety of the unbounded number of focuses (as indicated by the Pythagorean hypothesis), so the straight line can be isolated into an endless number of areas. Thus, the developments of Ekichis and Turtles can be isolated into little bits. Presently consider this, each time the turtle is ahead, there is a little separation far from the Achilles. After the extension of Eklis, the turtle is moving somewhat further. So the separation between them is never going to be void. Also, as of now said that on the off chance that somebody needs to cross somebody, there must be zero separation between them over the span of the course. So clearly, Achilles will never cross the turtle. 

Since there is no slip-up in the contention (!) So Achilles will never have the capacity to crush the tortoise. It's hard to believe, but it's true! Has been settled. In any case, what's the oddity here? 

Presently how about we leave the creative energy to come to reality. Can a man who is running somewhat behind in the race never cross the front? Obviously. Harhamsai can be seen. So the genuine Catch 22 of the turtle and the Achilles dashing is in reality here. 

What's more, that is the Catch 22 which shook the pythonic hypothesis of that time. Jeno is as yet world-popular for this conundrum. While demonstrating the mistakes of Pythagoreanism, Janno introduced two Catch 22s before Socrates. He can be told with two oddity days. How about we leave Mahavira Ekiliyas and Shy Turtles like today.


[**source>>**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno%27s_paradoxes)