No but more importantly the entire series (including the people-rank posts) isn't worth $12000 and most certainly does not add $12000 of value to the Steem ecosystem.

As I have said many times, founders posting platform updates (and let's be clear, Dan writing about his plans to redesign the Steem voting system is a platform update, whether he disguises it as political philosophy and [claimed not to have been writing about Steem](https://steemit.com/politics/@dantheman/origin-of-the-right-to-vote-and-how-the-system-denies-this-right#@dantheman/re-firepower-re-dantheman-origin-of-the-right-to-vote-and-how-the-system-denies-this-right-20160813t173105502z) or not) getting high rewards is exploitative and impairs the ability of Steem to reward other users by depleting the reward pool. 

At this point, most of the damage has already been done and this one post is just the icing on the cake. I am undecided whether or not I will be downvoting it closer to payout. 

Oh, and those of you claiming that the post shouldn't be downvoted regardless of its value because it isn't plagiarism or spam _clearly_ did not get much value from the post.