I am working on my Master's thesis which is devoted to [analyzing the conflict between blockchain innovation and regulation in Europe](https://peakd.com/leofinance/@sorin.cristescu/blockchain-regulation-versus-innovation-in). I chose to dedicate the first chapter to a historical perspective and I thus turned toward a number of classics. 
 
![](https://images.ecency.com/DQmTPj4qyVrfmmLhM5xb9ixgrhc5bEy2cur9T7Dvh816SXe/image.png)
<sup>[source](https://9gag.com/tag/cognitive-dissonance)</sup>


The title of this post has been inspired by a quote from Yuval Noah Harari's bestseller "[Sapiens](https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Yuval-Noah-Harari/dp/1784873640/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=sapiens+a+brief+history+of+humankind&s=books&sr=1-1)". I read this book about five years ago and found it fantastic overall, despite the existence of some reflexions I strongly disagreed with and others that I think are provably wrong. 

It was one of the first books which I read with intent and a ballpoint pen in my hand, underlining passages that I found significant and quote-worthy. I even thought about dedicating a series of Steem (there was no Hive back then) posts to summarizing and commenting the book, but never mustered the energy to do it.

But coming back to the book assessment, you might be troubled by my statement above: 

>"How can you find the book **_fantastic overall_** if you point out to **_strong disagreements_** and **_provably wrong_** reflexions?" 

I would propose to you a slightly adapted quote from the book itself (p.230 of Vintage 2011 edition): _"Whatever path we take, the first step is to acknowledge the complexity of the dilemma and to accept that simplistically dividing the [books] into good [books] and bad [books] leads nowhere."_ 

The original quote was about the mixed legacy of imperialism and empires. It was referring to the past, and advised against seeing it in terms of _good guys_ and _bad guys_.

## Cognitive dissonance
But that was just a taste of Harari's thinking. The reflexions I found incredibly powerful and important are to be found before, in Chapter 9, "The Arrow of History", pages 183-184

It starts from an observation that makes many of us uncomfortable: our modern political order sees both **"social equality"** and **"individual freedom"** as fundamental values. And yet, Harari states bluntly, **_"the two values contradict each other. [...] The entire political history of the world since 1789 can be seen as a series of attempts to reconcile this contradiction."_**

If he had then offered his own attempt, the book would have been unremarkable. What makes it special is that Harari explains that not only such contradictions are pervasive and an inseparable part of every human culture, but they are **actually beneficial!** He calls them _"the engines of cultural development, responsible for the creativity and dynamism of our species."_ Hence the quotation in the title of this article: "Consistency is the playground of dull minds."

But he goes even further to reach the logical conclusion:
> **_Cognitive dissonance is often considered a failure of the human psyche. In fact, it is a vital asset. Had people been unable to hold contradictory beliefs and values, it would probably have been impossible to establish and maintain any human culture_**

Here I would like to point to one of my older posts in which I was analyzing the social impact blockchain technologies are likely to make: [Understanding blockchain's social impact](https://peakd.com/busy/@sorin.cristescu/understanding-blockchain-s-social-impact). In it, I was comparing the progress of human society to riding a bicycle, where the most important thing is to maintain **dynamic equilibrium.**

![](https://images.ecency.com/DQmZCFzUb4oiDq7LJAxvVPzEwx19Vif5Do7qB7odJuC6CRe/image.png)
<sup>[source](https://www.outsideonline.com/culture/opinion/fewer-kids-are-riding-bikes/)</sup>

We shall be buffeted from the left and the right by impulses stemming from contradictory beliefs. But as long as we keep at it, push the pedals, we manage to maintain balance and advance.

## Concluding remarks
Life is complex and there are few "simple calls". "Pushing the pedals" in the bicycle analogy means continuously thinking and assessing situations and trying to maintain the balance, lest we fall. 

As Harari observes in the beginning of the book ("The Cost of Thinking", p.9), thinking is hard work and doesn't come cheap: the human brain accounts for about 2-3% of total body weight but consumes 25% of of the body's energy when at rest. Compare that with only 8% of the energy for our evolutionary "cousins", the great apes.

So I will keep thinking hard while reckoning that most dilemmas I'll be faced with are complex, and that simplistically dividing between "good and "bad" will lead me nowhere. 

And the first task at hand is my Master's thesis where I attempt to keep the balance between something I tend to see as rather "good" (innovation) and something I tend to consider ... less so (regulation).