>We want, in every man, a long logic; we cannot pardon the absence of it, but it must not be spoken. 

So many identity token propositions! I am not sure its purpose. I am not interested in a static representation of my identity. I am also aware that a "fact" today, may not be a "fact" tomorrow.

>Logic is the procession or proportionate unfolding of the intuition; 

Just as a "law" today, could be illegal tomorrow.
<center>![May162019.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmddR5DeTa7SgtVtGJuStWWjJ8mwfuk8xvRvsttuPn61Pe/May162019.jpg)</center>

>but its virtue is as silent method; the moment it would appear as propositions, and have a separate value, it is worthless.

I read in *Religion and Agriculture: Sustainability in Christianity and Buddhism* by J. Lindsay Falvey, which also quoted this section, that today "most of our sustainability research is based on propositions and separate values." 

I was considering whether he was saying logic isn't the equivalent of a value proposition. That logic isn't itself an economic value and the minute it becomes one, it loses its value. 

Does the logic unfolding in one's life *predict* it?