<p><img src="https://img1.steemit.com/0x0/http://fintechist.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Ethereum-Classic.png" /></p>
<p>Charles Hoskinson just did a live interview with a few of our very own @cryptomarket and @crypt0 which both did a great job and asked great questions. </p>
<p>He basically laid out his plan for the future of ETC. </p>
<p>Now he did also begin by implying he is NOT interested in leading Ethereum Classic, but had some great points that will help ETC on it's way.</p>
<ul>
  <li>Tribes</li>
  <li>Roadmap</li>
  <li>Government Structure</li>
  <li>Funding</li>
</ul>
<h3>Tribes</h3>
<p>When talking about Tribes he discussed how the developers and investors in Ethereum Classic need to join together to come up with a strong community to help build a foundation for the future of Classic.</p>
<h3>Road map</h3>
<p>With a roadmap basically it was discussed once again that even though Charles was not interested in leading Classic he had great ideas on how creating a road map there could be focused goals of the community so that Ethereum Classic could be on a set path to being more widely accepted and used.</p>
<h3>Government Structure</h3>
<p>A treasury was discussed and a form of governance for Ethereum Classic which he said is currently called &quot;DAO LABS&quot; which was a focused group studying <em>how </em>to build a treasury for Ethereum Classic.</p>
<h3>Funding</h3>
<p>Lastly funding was discussed and Charles did mention he wasn't concerned if the price of ETC went up or down, but he was more interested in the academics. </p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>These are all great for Ethereum Classic, but one of the main things that I think needs to be focused on here is NOT changing too much.. Except the doubling with ETH issue, because the ORIGINAL code &quot;Ethereum Classic&quot; was supposed to be like the new digital <strong>World Computer</strong> or<strong> Internet 3.0 </strong>which just like with the internet now should NOT be consistently changed.. And for people concerned with hacks like the DAO I think these are things that should be treated like any other investment as a RISK!</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><strong>So if you agree, disagree, or even have more to add please comment below!</strong></p>