![U5dsLum8ojBDNKN4655YJ6QsYctVd8j_1680x8400.jpeg](https://steemitimages.com/DQmaBmHK1QWyT8QANvV9TJTqU6VPh2dtE613dsoBZYNb8gb/U5dsLum8ojBDNKN4655YJ6QsYctVd8j_1680x8400.jpeg)EOS is that the latest blockchain created by Dan Larimer, UN agency additionally light-emitting diode development of Bitshares and Steem.
When discharged in Gregorian calendar month of next year Eos can possible be the foremost advanced blockchain within the world, with uncomparable capabilities, huge quantifiability and low latency, additionally as good contract support.

EOS is presently still in development, however has reached a pre-release standing of one.0 DAWN and prepared|is prepared} for early good contract development to be ready at launch.
There has been talk Bitshares moving to Eos once it's prepared.
This idea deserves a discussion.
Bitshares will adopt Eos technical school in many ways in which.

Implement Bitshares as AN Eos contract.

Implement Bitshares AN Eos clone.

Adopt best Eos and Steem enhancements while not moving to a different blockchain.

Each of those choices have blessings and dis-advantages that ought to be thought-about.

I raised this subject on github and @xeroc created a comment concerning the primary possibility being but ideal. Here is what he wrote.

I had lots of discussion concerning this with Daniel Larimer and that we believe that it makes no sense business-wise to implement BitShares on high of Eos. BitShares could be a (potentially profitable) DAC (company) whereas Eos rather compares with a sociaty. The economical models behind those 2 is therefore totally different that I in person like BitShares to remain on its own Blockchain.

For instance, a BTS token on Eos would don't have any price, as a result of it cannot vote for producers and doesn't earn any fees (even if the good contracts have a fee associated, that fee a part of the code is removed and also the fee-less contract is deployed as alternative).

What will add up is to leverage the lessons-learned from Eos and integrate elements of their code into BitShares - as an example their RPC interface appear to be quite nice.

Option a pair of is to clone Eos and create Bitshares base token of the blockchain with all the vesting privileges. This approach makes Bitshares AN Eos blockchain,
maybe even the primary one :),
with all the benefits.

Option three is for Bitshares to remain separate and on existing blockchain. If this selection is picked than this stuff ought to be thought-about.

Need to adopt best options of Eos (and Steem) in Bitshares blockchain.
I would counsel considering dropping transfer and perhaps even trade fees in favor of metered model of Steem and Eos. this is often would increase adoption and improve easy use.

Need to think about that if Bitshares doesn't move to Eos, another DEX contract are enforced by someone which DEX are in competition with Bitshares.

EOS are terribly scalable and run with low latency (sub-second), which can be a big advantage future over- Bitshares, unless it adopts same technical school.

Lack of good contract support in Bitshares is critical disadvantage vs Eos.

If Bitshares stays separate it'll ought to inter-operate with Eos additionally as attainable and this too has to be planned.