<div class="text-justify">

When I took this photo of an angry chicken in Stockholm the other day, it reminded me of someone and I knew it would come in handy. I didn't realise it would be used so soon, but given the events of the last couple days in the US, I think it is pretty fitting for now! Who would have thought even a few months ago that the US would be *openly* siding with one of the most vicious dictators in the world?

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/tarazkp/23xozAiBGGuQ8L3u5JtkqTJuppefTzEd7y7QuT851TFB1JXdNwpPXskHheLE935SGioWu.png)

There is a lot to unpack there which I am not going to get into, but what is clear is that unfortunately war is likely to expand, and Europe is going to have to handle its own security. This might seem obvious, but after World War 2, the formation of NATO was a barely concealed concerted effort by the US to demilitarise Europe and increase its own power over the rest of the world, which it achieved successfully and it generated a massive amount of wealth for the US, and continues to do so. The escalation of fear of Russia has meant that countries are again buying up huge amounts of weapons to expand their military, and the major winner of those contracts is of course, the US. Nothing is as good for the weapons industry as war - or even the threat of war.

> So, Europe is again going to weaponize, and has been over the last few years.

However, in the past there was an "agreement" with the US that weapons would be bought from them, in exchange for *reliable protection,* much like racketeering by the mafia. But, with the current US government no longer seen as a reliable military partner, nor as a reliable trade partner, the rest of the world really should be looking to decouple from reliance and instead build their own military supply chains to provide for themselves. Again, this is unfortunate, because ideally, the world would be spending money and resources on things that actually matter, like wellbeing of humanity - but instead we are spending to protect humanity from inhumanity. 

The US spends 40% of military spending in the world to maintain its military, but it is also the largest seller of military equipment, selling just under 400 billion worth in 2024. That is about 45% of the total expenditure the US makes on its military, which is just over 900 billion a year. Total global military spending was in the range of about 2.5 trillion in 2023. 

> War generates business activity. 

And really, that is what all the war is about anyway, despite idealistic claims. It is about control and power, and money is the facilitator. The US has been able to successfully leverage its economy to drive a huge amount of its income into the military to control the world and be able to offer "protection" for its allies and now, threat of removal of that protection if countries don't give it what it wants - like mining rights. Or rebuilding rights. Or whatever it can get to make more money from the war, than it put into it. 

> That is business.

And this business has hopefully been made painfully clear to the world now, where the "leader of the free world" (a highly ironic term) is willing to align with whoever is going to give the best monetary deal, even if it puts the world at greater risk. Paying for peace is a losing game, because greed of the peace supplier will keep increasing and the cost will become too high. Paying with natural resources is a losing game also, because once the country is depleted, the supplier moves on, leaving it even weaker than before.

While the average person spends their resources and fills their time with being entertained, our safety and security as a species is in a highly precarious situation. If there is someone playing with the threat of World War 3 at the moment, it is the US president, because they are forcing the world into a corner, and once backed in, they are forced to fight fiercely and at any cost. They have no choice. 

So now Europe is going to have to weaponize, but rather than continuing buying from the US, it should be ramping up its own production capabilities in order to be self-reliant. The EU population is 1.5x the size of the US and it has production and skill capabilities in many areas. This could be good for the European economy, but let's face it - it is bad for global progress.

We really do seem doomed to repeat the past and rather than putting our minds, skills and resources to work to advance wellbeing, we will keep infighting, like spoiled rich children, trying to score points for bragging rights against the other, causing lifelong rifts between groups that should be working together, and benefiting together. 

> It is pathetic.

The sooner decentralisation of the economy happens, the better, because then the tax money of citizens can't be used to build wealth and power in the hands of the few, to have more control over the freedoms of those who financed the system. Us. Politics is a shambles in so many ways and has fallen s far that there is not even the guise of civility, trying to hide the true intentions. And, all of us are at an increasing risk, no matter where we live in the world, or how much wealth we have. But a select few are willing for us to pay that cost, if it gives them access to just a little bit more. 

We have come so far as technologically, yet barely moved as a species.
 


Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]


</div>