RE: How Many Of My Upvoters Are Actively Using Hive? (Addressing Downvote Cancel Culture on Hive) by acidyo
Viewing a response to: @acidyo/r1d7o9
hive·@thoughts-in-time·
0.000 HBD<div class=text-justify> Look, I'm not trying to go on a witch hunt, but the fact of the matter is that reciprocity is something that happens from time to time. It happens IRL and in business very naturally. I'm not even bothered per se when I see it because it's none of my business. I mean, if it's a blatantly obviously shitpost or low effort post, that might be annoying. What we're talking about is the downvoting of legit content that people pour their hearts into writing. That and the targeting of specific communities because of ideological differences. Your set to get rewarded $183.51 for your latest post, and it's 778 words long. If you compare that to his 4350-word post from five days ago that got zeroed out--it's damn near criminal. All I'm saying is that HIVE will never be fair, and comparison is the thief of joy. Instead of seeing content that people poured their heart in and maliciously downvoting that. Why not find someone else's content that is under-rewarded and give them a nice big healthy upvote. In life, we buy what we want and ignore the content we don't want to see. Punishing HIVE-folks because they have different opinions doesn't serve the broad array of cultures that will make the various social media dApps stand out among the other platforms. Specifically, those that engage in grimy demonetization tactics. Do you think that you're uniquely qualified to be the judge of what content is safe enough for others to read? So many people are getting hurt by these vaccines. When they go to social media to tell their stories, they get silenced by the technocratic elite. I think when the truth finally emerges, and it is daily, you're going to feel very sorry about what you've been doing on the chain. Just today, for example, [the NIH has admitted that they had indeed funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan.](https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1450947395508858880) And this means that Tony Fauci outright lied to Congress and Rand Paul about the bioweapon research they jointly conducted with the aid of China. These topics are serious business. And I know you are not interested in it right now, either that or about as interested as a child choosing between chocolate and vanilla ice cream cones. However, I promise you this: when people start dying en masse from these shots, you will quickly find out that these 'boring' or 'dangerous' topics will become very interesting to you. It'll be interesting because you'll have friends or family who will undoubtedly have gotten affected adversely by these experimental vaccine trials. I think I even gave you a large PDF document full of social media scrappings and images about the vaccine damages, and this was before they were censoring or "fact-checking" content. At the time I did it, I knew that you were a reckless downvoter. But because I know that people are more important than this silly social media company we call HIVE, that didn't stop me from trying to warn you not to volunteer. Even if you did volunteer for the shot once or twice--that doesn't mean that [if you feel you've made a mistake,](https://gettr.com/post/pen6rkc04a) that you have to double down and keep getting hurt by them. [Here is an additional Easter egg for you.](https://ibb.co/phy0bnJ) The image was taken from [this document.](https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf) </div>