I have written about the importance to the public discussion of real journalists reporting real facts in response to [Univision's Jorge Ramos](https://steemit.com/politics/@tracemayer/univision-journalist-jorge-ramos-neutrality-is-not-an-option-for-journalists-with-donald-trump) and [MSNBC Mike Brzezinski](https://steemit.com/politics/@tracemayer/msnbc-journalist-mika-brzezinski-i-can-t-pretend-to-cover-donald-trump-fairly) both saying they cannot cover the facts with objectivity and neutrality and how [Julian Assange of Wikileaks may be the only real journalist left](https://steemit.com/politics/@tracemayer/is-julian-assange-of-wikileaks-the-last-real-journalist).

<center>http://i.imgur.com/dcYPoTO.jpg</center>

Now it appears the mighty Google is censoring search results to protect Hillary Clinton. For example, [Paul Joseph Watson](https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/769595103757398016/) tweeted this comparison between Google and Yahoo! search results. It makes one wonder if he will be banned like [Milo Yiannopoulos was for his political speech](http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/19/breaking-milo-suspended-twitter-20-minutes-party/).

<center>http://i.imgur.com/LPkjcZR.png</center>

This is very curious behavior from Google. Are they really censoring search results for political purposes? What do you think? Is this good or bad for the public discourse and discussion?