In Time in just two shots and some words. A potential dystopian Steem endpoint?
film·@twoshots·
0.000 HBDIn Time in just two shots and some words. A potential dystopian Steem endpoint?
https://ipfs.pics/ipfs/QmZeTYKgaUAd6LchwMdCf2sL7KwLXPhgL3HbyLk262WWMz https://ipfs.pics/ipfs/QmVPZfBTEjdZEKKFMnSEQ76Xgpr177znL3DgA6jRz1wecP https://ipfs.pics/ipfs/QmWvxyd3vPzAxHd3B2e7vJwath8jSYsV8esucLXMzzFVhU Wow. Horribly flawed, terribly interesting, and eminently watchable. The end result explored what makes life worth living, predation, atypical economies (not unlike Steem!), all with mild success. It has a polished style and beautiful aesthetics (a scene with Timberlake and Seyfried skinny dipping at night in a Northern California bay, lit by the green glow of their life clocks, and a looming mansion set above them on the cliff comes to mind, so beautiful that I cheated and made it my third shot). So I liked it, had fun with it, it didn’t waste my…time or anything. But this could have been so much better, if not for these five flaws. In retrospect and in light of Steemit, it becomes even more interesting as *In Time* features a strange economy where TIME has disrupted all other currencies and the follow-on effects of that are ripping the world apart, creating a huge divide between the haves and have nots. One of the wackier fake economies ever rendered onto film but there Steem has probably one of the wackier and most exciting economies I've ever seen, so they are spiritual siblings. Will the rich prevail over the meek on Steem? Or can JT save us, too? **Five flaws (There be spoilers ahead!):** 1: The ridiculous way time is exchanged in this world. This is a dystopian alternate reality where lifespan, time, is currency, and everyone has a green digitally lit counter on their forearm that represents how much lifespan, time, one has left. You use this lifespan to pay for things. What a crazy model! Don't people know that real currency is blog posts like this one or travelogues or improvements to Steemit? If only THOSE things could be tradeable, then we'd be cooking with gas. In *In Time*, people exchange this wannabe Steem currency by either gripping one another’s forearms or applying a device/reader to one’s forearm while a ridiculous, globule noise indicates that a time transfer is taking place. It’s sounds ridiculous, looks weird, and happens maybe 100 times in the movie. Also, even more ridiculous, you can by force steal someone’s lifespan by gripping their forearm and willing it away, even when they are asleep. And don’t even get me started on the “fighting,” wherein people grab each other’s arms, like in a stationary arm wrestling contest, and will each other’s time away – it was like [the sex depicted in _Barbarella_ where people just touched hands](http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HI1sUP2dvcI#t=228s), but that was a dumb “satirical” vehicle for a dirty Frenchmen to keep his sex symbol wife and _In Time_, to my knowledge, has no such excuses. And whoever invented the structure of this technology in this dystopian alternate reality did a really poor job and basically ensured inefficient, low-level predation among the poor, and risky, high-level predation against the rich. The film missed on a lot of logistics issues, ones that didn’t make sense in the context of the world created. 2: Justin Timberlake is not a good actor. He just can’t sell emotion, has no depth to anything he pushes out. He ruined one of the best scenes in the movie, one which was both emotionally affecting and cool, by letting out a cry of rage and despair that sounded like Big Foot’s death scream. He’s likeable and cool, but his acting hollowed this film out. 3: Way too many time jokes, puns, and references. Made it harder to take seriously. 4: It’s like they didn’t give the story enough…time to develop. It’s a breathless, hectic movie, quickly moving from scene to scene, with very little character development and an emphasis on thrills and action and running and hastily designed plans. Very unlike _Gattaca_ in that way, more on that in 5 5: _Gattaca_ is a favorite of mine. The same director did _In Time_ (and _The Truman Show_), which seemed very similar: dystopian alternate reality, story of an individual who is disadvantaged in this world for unjust reasons, romance with someone who is advantaged, a hawkish policemen on the trail. But _Gattaca_ succeeded by making it personal. It depicted the intimate story of Ethan Hawke’s Vincent’s attempt to climb a “ladder” and transcend the genetic barriers put in his way, to transcend all the way into space from nothing. His sacrifices, risks, and struggles felt personal. He poured himself out, and you could feel it (the Michael Nyman score really added a lot, stringed, stretched, striving yearning, especially the second time Vincent swam into the ocean in a contest of wills against his brother “How are you doing this Vincent? How have you done any of this? We have to go back.” “It’s too late for that. We're closer to the other side.” “What other side? You wanna drown us both?” “You wanna know how I did it? This is how I did it Anton. I never saved anything for the swim back.”, God, the movie is fantastic). It was his story, his small story, in the context of a wider dystopian world, a world Vincent overcame, but importantly didn’t conquer, didn’t transform. He wasn’t a messiah, he wasn’t perfect, he was a relatable human being. JT in _In Time_ is a messiah. A cool, frenetic, man of almost constant action, who has a solution to every problem, as he moves through each scene with reckless swagger. Everything he does pretty much works out, he changes the world, etc. It’s hard to feel a deep connection with someone who can do no wrong, who gets out of every jam without missing a beat. Cooler, safer, much more distant. _[In Time](http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/in_time/)_ by Andrew Niccol. **Two Shots Note:** *Follow me if you love movies or want to start. I take movies and turn them into just two shots which may or may not be representative of the movie but hopefully comprise a new, visually interesting repurposing of the movie. I add variable amounts of commentary and strive to be spoiler-free. I LOVE movies and I hope each post can be a jumping off point for someone to try a new movie out.* *I am looking forward to a long, beautiful Steeming experience as I get the hang of this medium. I am the process of deprecating my Tumblr blog ([evidence is here](http://twoshots.tumblr.com/post/24139997521/takeshelter)). Follow me or even better, reply with comments and movie recommendations. Thanks!*