http://fb.ru/media/i/2/1/7/6/9/7/i/217697_700x307.jpg

 Economists are deeply convinced that economics is a science that determines the life of people.  Economic independence gives every person access to freedom, self-expression and creativity, this is very well monetized, especially in developed countries.

  A beneficial circle is created: the more a person is economically independent, the more he has the opportunity to produce ideas.  The more developed creative abilities, the more his individual abilities just bring in income.  The society from these beneficiary circles of individual people only wins, the effect of additionality is created.  When creative people find themselves together to solve a particular problem, they as pigs near the trough begin to compete with each other, not just for food, but for creating and promoting ideas. 

 This effect leads to the creation of new technologies and is crucial both for economic growth in general and for the well-being of individuals.  To my great regret, this is less true for developing countries that have not yet succeeded in creating effective institutions that open the way for economic growth.  Laws and correlations of economic science are precisely considered by many as defining human life.

  Another thing is Ekaterina Shulman.

https://sobesednik.ru/sites/default/files/complex_images/images/dsc07282.jpg

  She believes that the main are the science of social interrelations in society.  And in this there is a significant part of the truth.  If the society is dominated by polarized groups, the main incentive for people will be the creation of black market prizes, they will literally tear the economy apart, which will create obstacles for economic growth.  Individuals will win, most will drag out a beggarly existence. 

 The reason for this is the existing social mechanisms, and only then their implementation in the economic space. The more amusing is the dominance of conflict-authoritarian (primitive) groups in society.  Where they capture the social space because of the characteristics of primitive psychology, exclusively the distributive economy thrives, the redistribution of resources from a different kind of rent, rather than creation, is effective.  It does not require complex social mechanisms in the form of representative or direct democracy.

  The only effective interaction is direct violence, there is no need for contractual capacity and consensus.  Clever men in such a society are persecuted, botanists, whom everyone despises.  Creation, creativity does not live in such a space, so there is a polarization of society to the poor and the rich, who managed to capture the points of redistribution of rental income. 

http://habrastorage.org/storage1/37b2392d/6247c2c4/09d4e4d4/e07ffe7f.jpg

 The only incentive is to capture these points, select and divide among themselves.  Here again the primacy of social organization arises.  The society is torn apart by the contradictions of polarized groups, the result is economic backwardness, economic growth is not stable and long-lasting.  As a rule, there is an abrupt, catching up development. 

 But I'm a philosopher, so I'm deeply convinced that the content of space between the ears determines the social organization, and then the economic space.  The idea of ​​the absolute value of the human personality draws the idea of ​​natural human rights.  As soon as the thought of rights arises, the idea of ​​private property immediately appears.  It is impossible to realize the right to life without protecting private property.

  As soon as there is a need to agree on protection, a social consensus strategy immediately appears.  It begins to take a steady and repeatable character crystallizes in the institutes.  They create an economic space where you can realize your opportunities without threats. 

 The dominance of the private property market is optimal.  Thus, the organization of institutions complicates social relations, requires more subtle and inclusive institutions of governance, which leads to the dominance of democracy.  

https://imgp.golos.io/0x0/http://storage6.static.itmages.ru/i/17/1202/h_1512216894_2179553_a13afedacb.jpg

There is a core line: the idea of ​​the absolute value of human life - human rights - democratic institutions - private property - creative economy.  Usually, savages are dominated by unlimited ambitions and eternal enmity of all against each, but in an incomprehensible way, even in antiquity, among savagery and horror, deviation arose.  

In a group of people, ambition melted into self-esteem and launched this unique, completely unnatural mechanism for that time.  He began to repeat and dominate, captured a significant part of the planet and is the main modern trend.  But savages are dominated by ambitions, so their survival strategy is described in the theory of games "five pirates", of which I have already written a lot.  

Mistrust to each other and permanent violence create hierarchical conflict-authoritarian groups.  The main social mechanism is the constant redistribution of property, violation of human rights.  The possibility of creating institutions is blocked, but if they appear, they are imitative or safely sleep until better times.  Attitude to the person here dominates as to a toilet paper: used and have thrown out. 

 Of course, such an attitude closes any possibility of creating long-lasting stable links on the principle of game theory "prisoner's dilemma" about which I wrote earlier.  Instead of the right, an interesting phenomenon predominates - to live by concepts.

  And these concepts, depending on the situation, are surprisingly transformed in favor of the one who has power and power.  The only effective equilibrium in such a system is the distribution of rental income.  This leads to expansion and wars.

  Constant change in living conditions does not form a legal space and in the economic space control markets and authorities dominate, the institution of the private property market is generally not formed at all as it contradicts the disenfranchised position of people.  Such a community does well three things - robbing, killing and distributing the rental income ... 

Here its own core line: unlimited ambition - a person is not a value - life by concepts is a bandit distributive economy ... So consciousness defines a social organization, and that, in turn,  outlines the contours of a possible economic strategy, determines economic incentives.

http://fb.ru/post/psychology/2017/12/5/19831