How I will be Voting/Flagging under the new system - suggestions for others as well!
blog·@venuspcs·
0.000 HBDHow I will be Voting/Flagging under the new system - suggestions for others as well!
So many people have noticed you can now SLIDE to adjust your Voting Power when upvoting Blog Posts and Comments. You can also adjust your Voting Power when flagging a post! So with these new abilities I had to determine how to properly (and fairly IMHO) use them. <h1>Upvoting Usage/Suggestions</h1> <ul> <li>Quality Blog Posts will receive between 50 and 100% depending upon:<br> a. Frequency of posts by author<br> b. How well the content is divided, amount of imagery (if needed), etc.<br> c. Whether or not I have previously upvoted posts from this author (new authors get 100% more commonly than authors I have previously upvoted)</li> <li>New Authors I discover that have lots of Quality Content will receive between 1 and 25% on all their Blog Posts. Depending on the frequency and quality of their content.</li> <li>Comments typically get no vote but if they are really good comments or comments on my own posts I give 25-50% depending on quality.</li> <li>Authors who write quality content but never vote on my content get 25% votes from me.</li> </ul> <h1>Flagging Usage/Suggestions</h1> <ul> <li>Blatant Plaigarism (entire post) gets 100% VP Flagged!</li> <li>Quality Posts with lack of Source/References on quotes, imagery, etc. get 50% Flagged and a comment to add references to remove flag.</li> <li>Quality Posts that include a Youtube Video (without source) get 25% Flagged and a comment to add source link for the video.</li> <li>Obvious scams/scammers get 100% Flagged on every post they put up, even if it isn't a scam post. ** Sorry but these low life's really piss me off! **</li> </ul> <h2>If I encounter someone who writes consistently Quality Content but I personally do not like them for whatever reason I still give 25-50% VP votes to their posts. My thinking is "personal opinions shouldn't be a factor in determining the merit and worth of Quality Content" especially when Steemit.com is so young and needs to promote the quality content regardless of personal opinion so as to attract a larger pool of new members.</h2>
👍 venuspcs, warhammer, dr2073, elyaque, dr-who, imc, dr-house, gamerate, discernente, natalyt, creatorgalaxy, vootka, immortal, zite, immortality, future-shock, rashka, longtech, budda, steemitpatina, runridefly, karenmckersie, ace108, sijoittaja, kamil5, ptmikesteem, eight-rad, framelalife, rainchen, meesterboom, merej99, mandibil, steevc, tee-em, klye, naifaz, sonzweil, helikopterben, hunterisgreat, kooshikoo, crazyearner, matrixdweller, shawn-brewer, james-show, reaction, dmacshady,