Journalism Is Not Espionage #Unity4J
wikileaks·@wedacoalition·
0.000 HBDJournalism Is Not Espionage #Unity4J
<html> <p><img src="https://i0.wp.com/wedapeopleblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/addtext_com_mtkwndq4mjq3mti.jpg?ssl=1&w=450" width="450" height="314"/></p> <p><br></p> <p>Please take a moment to read this speech by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo when he was the CIA Director.</p> <p>Once you read this speech Pompeo gave at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, I hope people will understand that no matter what side of politics you're on journalism is not Espionage.</p> <p>Mike Pompeo outlines many things in this speech like how to cut off Assange's ability to communicate, how to turn the public against Assange and strengthen support for the intelligence community.</p> <p>But nothing is more obvious in this rant towards Assange than the intelligence community in America's hatred for Assange and Wikileaks.</p> <p>Before you read this nastiness, absorb this quote from NSA whistle-blower Thomas Drake</p> <h3><em>”I was not going to sit still and remain silent because if I had remained silent then I myself would have been complicit in the conduct of a crime against a sovereignty, against who we are as people, that’s we the people, capital W, capital P, We the People” - Thomas Drake</em></h3> <h2><a href="https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testimony/2017-speeches-testimony/pompeo-delivers-remarks-at-csis.html"><em>Pompeo's Wikileaks Tantrum</em></a></h2> <blockquote><strong>And that is one of the many reasons why we at CIA find the celebration of entities like WikiLeaks to be both perplexing and deeply troubling. Because while we do our best to quietly collect information on those who pose very real threats to our country, individuals such as Julian Assange and Edward Snowden seek to use that information to make a name for themselves. As long as they make a splash, they care nothing about the lives they put at risk or the damage they cause to national security.</strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong>WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service. It has encouraged its followers to find jobs at CIA in order to obtain intelligence. It directed Chelsea Manning in her theft of specific secret information. And it overwhelmingly focuses on the United States, while seeking support from anti-democratic countries and organizations. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is – a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia. In January of this year, our Intelligence Community determined that Russian military intelligence—the GRU—had used WikiLeaks to release data of US victims that the GRU had obtained through cyber operations against the Democratic National Committee. And the report also found that Russia’s primary propaganda outlet, RT, has actively collaborated with WikiLeaks. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Now, for those of you who read the editorial page of the Washington Post—and I have a feeling that many of you in this room do—yesterday you would have seen a piece of sophistry penned by Mr. Assange. You would have read a convoluted mass of words wherein Assange compared himself to Thomas Jefferson, Dwight Eisenhower, and the Pulitzer Prize-winning work of legitimate news organizations such as the New York Times and the Washington Post. One can only imagine the absurd comparisons that the original draft contained. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Assange claims to harbor an overwhelming admiration for both America and the idea of America. But I assure you that this man knows nothing of America and our ideals. He knows nothing of our third President, whose clarion call for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness continue to inspire us and the world. And he knows nothing of our 34th President, a hero from my very own Kansas, who helped to liberate Europe from fascists and guided America through the early years of the Cold War. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> No, I am quite confident that had Assange been around in the 1930s and 40s and 50s, he would have found himself on the wrong side of history. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong>We know this because Assange and his ilk make common cause with dictators today. Yes, they try unsuccessfully to cloak themselves and their actions in the language of liberty and privacy; in reality, however, they champion nothing but their own celebrity. Their currency is clickbait; their moral compass, nonexistent. Their mission: personal self-aggrandizement through the destruction of Western values.</strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong>Clearly, these individuals are not especially burdened by conscience. We know this, for example, because Assange has been more than cavalier in disclosing the personal information of scores of innocent citizens around the globe. We know this because the damage they have done to the security and safety of the free world is tangible. And the examples are numerous. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong>When Snowden absconded to the comfortable clutches of Russian intelligence, his treachery directly harmed a wide range of US intelligence and military operations. Despite what he claims, he is no whistleblower. True whistleblowers use the well-established and discreet processes in place to voice grievances; they do not put American lives at risk.</strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> In fact, a colleague of ours at NSA recently explained that more than a thousand foreign targets—people, groups, organizations—more than a thousand of them changed or tried to change how they communicated as a result of the Snowden disclosures. That number is staggering.</strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> And the bottom line is that it became harder for us in the Intelligence Community to keep Americans safe. It became harder to monitor the communications of terrorist organizations that are bent on bringing bloodshed to our shores. Snowden’s disclosures helped these groups find ways to hide themselves in the crowded digital forest. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Even in those cases where we were able to regain our ability to collect, the damage was already done. We work in a business with budgetary and time constraints. The effort to earn back access that we previously possessed meant that we had less time to look for new threats. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> As for Assange, his actions have attracted a devoted following among some of our most determined enemies. Following a recent WikiLeaks disclosure, an al Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula member posted a comment online thanking WikiLeaks for providing a means to fight America in a way that AQAP had not previously envisioned. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> AQAP represents one of the most serious terrorist threats to our country and the world. It is a group that is devoted not only to bringing down civilian passenger planes, but our way of life as well. That Assange is the darling of terrorists is nothing short of reprehensible.</strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Have no doubt that the disclosures in recent years caused harm—great harm—to our nation’s security, and they will continue to do so over the long term. They threaten the trust we’ve developed with our foreign partners when trust is a crucial currency among allies. They risk damaging morale for the good officers of the Intelligence Community who take the high road every day. And I can’t stress enough how these disclosures have severely hindered our ability to keep all Americans safe. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> No, Julian Assange and his kind are not the slightest bit interested in improving civil liberties or enhancing personal freedom. They have pretended that America’s First Amendment freedoms shield them from justice. They may have believed that, but they are wrong. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Assange is a narcissist who has created nothing of value. He relies on the dirty work of others to make himself famous. He is a fraud—a coward hiding behind a screen. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> And in Kansas, we know something about false Wizards. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> But I’m not the only one who knows what Assange really is. Even those who often benefit from Assange’s leaks have called him out for his overblown statements. The Intercept, which in the past has gleefully reported on unauthorized disclosures, accused WikiLeaks in late March of “stretching the facts” in its comments about CIA. In the same article, the Intercept added that the documents were “not worth the concern WikiLeaks generated by its public comments.” </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> So we face a crucial question: What can we do about this? What can and should CIA, the United States, and our allies do about the unprecedented challenge posed by these hostile non-state intelligence agencies? </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> While there is no quick fix—no foolproof cure—there are steps that we can take to undercut the danger. First, it is high time we called out those who grant a platform to these leakers and so-called transparency activists. We know the danger that Assange and his not-so-merry band of brothers pose to democracies around the world. Ignorance or misplaced idealism is no longer an acceptable excuse for lionizing these demons </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Second, there are steps that we have to take at home—in fact, this is a process we’ve already started. We’ve got to strengthen our own systems; we’ve got to improve internal mechanisms that help us in our counterintelligence mission. All of us in the Intelligence Community had a wake-up call after Snowden’s treachery. Unfortunately, the threat has not abated. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> I can’t go into great detail, but the steps we take can’t be static. Our approach to security has to be constantly evolving. We need to be as clever and innovative as the enemies we face. They won’t relent, and neither will we. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> We can never truly eliminate the threat but we can mitigate and manage it. This relies on agility and on dynamic “defense in depth.” It depends on a fundamental change in how we address digital problems, understanding that best practices have to evolve in real time. It is a long-term project but the strides we have taken—particularly the rapid and tireless response of our Directorate of Digital Innovation—give us grounds for optimism. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> Third, we have to recognize that we can no longer allow Assange and his colleagues the latitude to use free speech values against us. To give them the space to crush us with misappropriated secrets is a perversion of what our great Constitution stands for. It ends now. </strong></blockquote> <blockquote><br></blockquote> <blockquote><strong> And finally—and perhaps most importantly—we need to deepen the trust between the Intelligence Community and the citizens we strive to protect. </strong></blockquote> <p>Now more than ever we have to stand with Julian Assange and Wikileaks as the-powers-that-be try further their crusade against the freedom of information. #Unity4J</p> </html>
👍 cheetah, uuits, an0nkn0wledge, etka, unity4j, apsistrading, vapor, neoconqueso, charisma777, deepdives, dexterdumb, mjhomb, suzi3d, cattledog, davilminded, valued-customer, v4vapid, peaceonerf, wedacoalition, woodparker, xenkallas, snootch, jomangee, bifilarcoil, ausbitbank, erikh526, ebonkim, sionnab,