Judgment is not equal

View this thread on: d.buzz | hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com
·@xrayman·
5.148 HBD
Judgment is not equal
<div class=text-justify>


![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/xrayman/23x1FU1YRLZzuYMTjj85dPNWqzB1eynkG1nkM5S15NFy2ha9gbEkYxMa6MuUwZj8j7QRM.png)
<sup>https://pixabay.com/photos/cat-box-predator-650770/</sup>

The way we look at others and ourselves is completely different.

And the optics of each situation are practically determined by the gaze we place on each of the two situations.

And because of this lack of synchronicity, it ends up generating many conflicts (internally and with others) and between individuals, generations, social groups, political parties, clubs, nations or even races or ethnic groups.

Each person is influenced by what they have experienced and what they have felt. But the difference in judgment is not really there.

Action is what we actually do that can be observed by others.

We judge others by that same action, or actions, and not by their intentions, determinisms or values; but we end up judging ourselves by our intentions, values and determinisms, and not by the concrete actions we have taken. We end up justifying our actions by framing them, and the reasons that led us to do them, but we don't do this with the other person.


When we see something in another person that we don't understand, or that we disagree with, we may be the first to judge them wrongly (even if we don't show it to the other person or to others). These value judgments, which aren't really value judgments because they're just points of view of a particular action, without us having any idea of the value or intention behind it, lead to enormous entropy.

When we are judged by our actions, and we ourselves are judged by our intentions, there is a marked asynchrony that puts the other in a position of attacking our convictions and sets of values.


Because each being has their own “inner box” with which they live, they should always try not to connect personally with comments that other people might make. They don't have access to our “inner box”.

And how can we reduce this friction between the outside and our inside? We only have the chance to become more understanding, more empathetic, to be able to look at the other person not as someone who wants to harm us, but as someone who is looking for their own survival. And often, we are led to make decisions that are not the best. Decisions that aren't the most appropriate, or that don't take into account many other factors that we can only understand if we try to break down the barrier that distances us from the other and from our exterior.


Only one day, when humans are willing to listen more than talk, to try to understand the other side (not necessarily to cancel out their own side), will we be able to evolve as a species.

Thank you for your attention to my little reflection for today. 

##### Bem Hajam🍀

![separador.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/xrayman/23swppYGLECw991bW1wsSTEwnV8YKgqPHaiAdDJioriDcMJR4GymNLH1VbQ98ykpBYkob.png)


---
<sup>Free image from [Pixabay.com](https://pixabay.com/)</sup>
![XRayMan.gif](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/xrayman/23tSNKgT6Zssji2twDxLZSeSESs2q8pnNUYQuFe7gqFkFFT3rrjE8pcMnXVcFpd87PxJY.gif)

</div>
👍 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,